Arthurs v. City of Bakersfield
Filing
25
ORDER CLOSING CASE, signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 3/14/2017. CASE CLOSED. (Hall, S)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
JONATHAN ARTHURS,
12
13
14
Plaintiff,
v.
CITY OF BAKERSFIELD,
15
Defendants.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No.: 1:15-CV-0788- JLT
ORDER CLOSING CASE
16
17
The parties have stipulated to dismiss this matter (Doc. 24) and, in doing so, rely upon Federal
18
Rules of Civil Procedure Rule 41(a). Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1) provides, “the plaintiff
19
may dismiss an action without a court order by filing: . . . a stipulation of dismissal signed by all
20
parties who have appeared.”. . .” Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a). Once such a notice has been filed, an order of
21
the Court is not required to make the dismissal effective. Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(ii); Wilson v. City
22
of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 1997). Thus, the Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to close this
23
action in light of the stipulation as dictated by Rule 41(a).
24
25
26
27
28
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
March 14, 2017
/s/ Jennifer L. Thurston
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?