Olive v. Reynoso et al

Filing 9

ORDER to SHOW CAUSE why action should not be dismissed signed by Magistrate Judge Sandra M. Snyder on 6/1/2016. Response due within 14-Days.(Lundstrom, T)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

10

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

11
12

DAMIEN D. OLIVE,

13
14

Plaintiff,

Case No. 1:15-cv-0790 DLB PC
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY ACTION
SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED

v.
FOURTEEN-DAY DEADLINE

15
16

JANELLE REYNOSO, et al.,
Defendants.

17
18

Plaintiff Damien D. Olive, (“Plaintiff”), a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma

19

pauperis, filed this civil rights action on May 26, 2015. He consented to the jurisdiction of the

20

Magistrate Judge on June 8, 2015.

21

On April 20, 2016, the Court screened the complaint and found it failed to state a cognizable

22

claim for relief. Plaintiff was directed to file an amended complaint within thirty days. Over thirty

23

days have passed and Plaintiff has failed to comply. Plaintiff was advised that failure to comply

24

would result in dismissal of the action with prejudice for failure to state a claim.

25

Accordingly, Plaintiff is ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE why this action should not be

26

dismissed with prejudice for failure to state a claim. Plaintiff shall file a response to this order

27

within fourteen (14) days of the date of service.

28
1

1
2

Failure to show cause, or failure to respond to this order, will result in dismissal of this action
with prejudice.

3
4
5
6

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:

June 1, 2016

/s/ Sandra M. Snyder
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2