Hopson v. Montanez et al

Filing 29

ORDER REQUIRING Plaintiff to SHOW CAUSE Why this Action should not be Dismissed for Failure to Comply with a Court Order; Show Cause Response due in Five Days signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 12/7/2016. (Sant Agata, S)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 CYNTHIA HOPSON, Plaintiff, 10 ORDER REQUIRING PLAINTIFF TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THIS ACTION SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH A COURT ORDER v. 11 12 Case No. 1:15-cv-00803-SAB ELIASER MONTANEZ, dba EL CHARRO RESTAURANT, et al., (ECF No. 28) 13 Defendants. FIVE DAY DEADLINE 14 15 16 On September 12, 2016, the parties filed a notice of settlement, and an order issued on 17 September 13, 2016, requiring the parties to file dispositive documents on or before October 28, 18 2016. On October 31, 2016, Plaintiff filed a request for an extension of time to file dispositive 19 documents. On November 2, 2016, the Court granted Plaintiff’s request for an extension of time 20 to December 5, 2016 to file dispositive documents. The parties were advised that any future 21 requests for extensions of time should be made before the expiration of a deadline. Dispositive 22 documents were not filed, nor did the parties otherwise respond to the November 2, 2016 order. 23 Local Rule 110 provides that “[f]ailure of counsel or of a party to comply with these 24 Rules or with any order of the Court may be grounds for imposition by the Court of any and all 25 sanctions . . . within the inherent power of the Court.” The Court has the inherent power to 26 control its docket and may, in the exercise of that power, impose sanctions where appropriate, 27 including dismissal of the action. Bautista v. Los Angeles County, 216 F.3d 837, 841 (9th Cir. 28 2000). 1 Accordingly, the Court HEREBY ORDERS Plaintiff TO SHOW CAUSE within five (5) 1 2 days of the date of entry of this order why this action should not be dismissed for failure to 3 comply with the November 2, 2016 order. Plaintiff is forewarned that the failure to show 4 cause may result in the imposition of sanctions, including the dismissal of this action. 5 6 IT IS SO ORDERED. 7 Dated: December 7, 2016 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?