Hopson v. Montanez et al
Filing
34
ORDER REQUIRING MICHAEL S. WARDA TO SHOW CAUSE FOR HIS FAILURE TO APPEAR ON JANUARY 17, 2017. Response due by January 31, 2017; Show Cause Hearing February 8, 2017 at 10:00 a.m. before Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 1/17/2017. (Hernandez, M)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
CYNTHIA HOPSON,
Plaintiff,
12
13
14
15
Case No. 1:15-cv-00803-SAB
ORDER REQUIRING MICHAEL S.
WARDA TO SHOW CAUSE FOR HIS
FAILURE TO APPEAR ON JANUARY 17,
2017
v.
ELIASER MONTANEZ, et al.,
Response due by January 31, 2017
Show Cause Hearing: February 8, 2017 at
10:00 a.m. in Courtroom 9
Defendants.
16
17
18
On September 12, 2016, Plaintiff filed a notice of settlement. Based upon the notice of
19 settlement, all pending dates and matters in this action were vacated and the parties were
20 required to file dispositional documents on or before October 28, 2016. When the parties failed
21 to file dispositional documents, an order issued requiring the parties to show cause why this
22 action should not be dismissed. On December 11, 2016, Plaintiff filed a response stating that
23 after the parties had agreed to settle this action, the settlement agreement was sent to Mr. Warda
24 and no response was received. Plaintiff’s counsel has not received the settlement documents
25 despite extensive attempts to communicate with Mr. Warda.
26
On December 32, 2016, Plaintiff filed a request to withdraw the notice of settlement
27 based upon the failure of Defendants to pursue the settlement agreement. On January 4, 2017, an
28 order issued granting the request to withdraw the notice of settlement and setting a scheduling
1
1 conference in this action for January 17, 2017. Defendant’s counsel did not appear for the
2 January 17, 2017 scheduling conference.
Local Rule 110 provides that “[f]ailure of counsel or of a party to comply with these
3
4 Rules or with any order of the Court may be grounds for imposition by the Court of any and all
5 sanctions . . . within the inherent power of the Court.” The Court has the inherent power to
6 control its docket and may, in the exercise of that power, impose sanctions where appropriate,
7 including dismissal of the action. Bautista v. Los Angeles County, 216 F.3d 837, 841 (9th Cir.
8 2000).
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
9
1
10
Michael S. Warda shall show cause in writing on or before January 31, 2017 why
11
sanctions should not issue for the failure to appear at the January 17, 2017
12
scheduling conference;
2.
13
Michael S. Warda shall personally appear for a show cause hearing before
14
Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on February 8, 2017 at 10:00 a.m. in
15
Courtroom 9; and
3.
16
Failure to comply with this order will result in the issuance of sanctions.
17
18
IT IS SO ORDERED.
19 Dated:
January 17, 2017
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?