Madrigal v. Nationstar Mortgage LLC et al
ORDER REQUIRING DEFENDANT TO SUPPLEMENT MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 2/22/2017: It is hereby ordered that Defendant Nationstar Mortgage shall file a supplement to the motion for summary judgment which includes the note at issue in this action on or before February 27, 2017. (Valdez, E)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Case No. 1:15-cv-00809-SAB
ORDER REQUIRING DEFENDANT TO
SUPPLEMENT MOTION FOR SUMMARY
NATIONSTAR MORTGAGE LLC, et al.,
On January 31, 2017, Defendant Nationstar Mortgage, LLC filed a motion for summary
18 judgment in this action. In the motion, Defendant contends that Plaintiff Norma Madrigal is not
19 a third party beneficiary to the contract at issue in this action.
The California Civil Code provides that a contract made expressly for the benefit of a
21 third party may be enforced by that party at any time before the contract is rescinded. Cal. Civ.
22 Code § 1559. Ascertaining the intent of the parties is to be inferred solely from the language of
23 the written contract if possible. Cal. Civ. Code §§ 1638. While Defendant contends that
24 Plaintiff is not a third party beneficiary under the note and deed of trust that were executed in
25 purchasing the property at issue herein, the note was not included as evidence in support of the
26 motion for summary judgment.
27 / / /
28 / / /
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant Nationstar Mortgage shall file a
2 supplement to the motion for summary judgment which includes the note at issue in this action
3 on or before February 27, 2017.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
February 22, 2017
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?