Madrigal v. Nationstar Mortgage LLC et al
Filing
68
ORDER VACATING March 8, 2017 Hearing on Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment, signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 2/24/17. (Marrujo, C)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
NORMA MADRIGAL,
12
Plaintiff,
13
Case No. 1:15-cv-00809-SAB
ORDER VACATING MARCH 8, 2017
HEARING ON DEFENDANT’S MOTION
FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
v.
14
NATIONSTAR MORTGAGE LLC, et al.,
15
Defendants.
16
17
Defendant Nationstar Mortgage LLC filed a motion for summary judgment on January
18 31, 2017. Oral argument on Defendant Nationstar’s motion for summary judgment was set for
19 March 8, 2017. On February 22, 2017, Plaintiff filed a notice of change of address and on
20 February 23, 2017, Defendant Nationstar filed a notice that all all documents have previously
21 been served on Plaintiff’s address on file. However, Defendant Nationstar did reserve all
22 documents filed and submitted to the court since January 31, 2017 on Plaintiff at her new
23 address. The court notes that there is no indication that any documents previously served on
24 Plaintiff at her address of record have been returned.
25
Pursuant to the Local Rule, Plaintiff’s opposition to the motion for summary judgment
26 was due on February 22, 2017. L.R. 230(c). Plaintiff did not file a timely opposition to the
27 motion. The Local Rule provides that a party who fails to file a timely opposition is not entitled
28 to be heard in opposition to the motion at oral argument. L.R. 230(c).
1
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the hearing set for March 8, 2017, is
1
2 VACATED and the parties will not be required to appear at that time.
3
4
IT IS SO ORDERED.
5 Dated:
February 24, 2017
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?