Caetano v. Peery

Filing 42

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng on 2/10/2017 requiring Respondent to file a response to petition within 60-Days. (Lundstrom, T)

1
2
3
4
5
6
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
1:15-cv-00832 LJO MJS HC

9
NATHAN CAETANO,
10

ORDER REQUIRING RESPONDENT TO
Petitioner, FILE RESPONSE

11

SIXTY (60) DAY DEADLINE

v.
12
13
S. PEERY,
14
Respondent.
15
16
17

Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a petition for writ of habeas
corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254.

18

On February 8, 2017, the Court denied Respondent's motion to dismiss without

19

prejudice, and referred the matter to the assigned Magistrate Judge for further

20

proceedings. Accordingly, Respondent is hereby ordered to file a response to the

21

petition within sixty (60) days of the date of service of this order. The filing of any

22

responding opposition, traverse, or reply shall be made in accordance to the instructions

23

set forth in the briefing schedule previously issued by this Court on June 3, 2015.

24

(Briefing Schedule, ECF No. 6.)

25
26
27
28

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:

February 10, 2017

/s/

Michael J. Seng

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
1

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2