Ceasar v. Aguirre
Filing
51
ORDER Denying Plaintiff's 49 Motion to Order Defendants to Pay, signed by Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean on 9/17/18. (Gonzalez, R)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
10
WALTER D. CEASAR,
11
12
13
14
Plaintiff,
v.
E. AGUIRRE,
Case No. 1:15-cv-00873-LJO-EPG
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S
MOTION TO ORDER DEFENDANTS TO
PAY
(ECF No. 49)
Defendant.
15
16
Walter D. Ceasar, III (“Plaintiff”) filed a motion on March 15, 2018, asking for an order
17
that E. Aguirre (“Defendant”) pay the amount due under their settlement agreement, i.e.
18
$6,250.00. (ECF No. 49.) Plaintiff says that he has received a form from the California
19
Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, but no money. Id.
20
Defendant filed an opposition to the motion on April 4, 2018. (ECF No. 50.) Defendant
21
explains that Plaintiff had outstanding restitution greater than the settlement amount. Id. After
22
certain administrative fees were deducted pursuant to law, the remaining settlement award was
23
credited to Plaintiff’s account to reduce his restitution obligation by $5,952.38. Id. There were no
24
funds leftover to pay to Plaintiff. Id.
25
The Court has reviewed the settlement agreement and documents provided by Defendant.
26
Plaintiff agreed that the funds would first go toward restitution. See Settlement Agreement and
27
Release, ECF No. 50-1 at 4 (“CDCR shall pay Plaintiff $6,250.00 (the settlement amount).
28
However, Plaintiff understands that CDCR is obligated by California Penal Code section 2085.8
1
1
to collect any amounts owed by a prisoner under a restitution fine or order, including any
2
administrative fees related to such amounts.”). This is consistent with the law, which requires
3
that any settlement amount first go to pay outstanding restitution. See Cal. Pen. Code § 2085.8(a)
4
(“Compensatory or punitive damages awarded by trial or settlement to any inmate . . . in
5
connection with a civil action brought against a federal, state, or local jail, prison, or correctional
6
facility, or any official or agent thereof, shall be paid directly, after payment of reasonable
7
attorney's fees and litigation costs approved by the court, to satisfy any outstanding restitution
8
orders or restitution fines against that person. The balance of the award shall be forwarded to the
9
payee after full payment of all outstanding restitution orders and restitution fines, subject to
10
11
subdivision (c).”).
Thus, Defendants have comported with the agreement and law in paying the settlement
12
amount toward Plaintiff’s restitution. And it appears from all evidence submitted that Plaintiff’s
13
restitution amount was greater than the award.
14
That said, the Court would have expected this to be discussed at the settlement
15
conference. The undersigned judge did not conduct the settlement conference and does not know
16
if this issue was raised at that conference, but from Plaintiff’s motion, it appears that this came as
17
a surprise to Plaintiff. If so, the Court understands Plaintiff’s surprise and disappointment.
18
As Defendant’s payment comported with the law, the Court will not grant Plaintiff’s
19
motion. The Court will, however, express its opinion and understanding that the issue of
20
restitution should be raised at future settlement conferences so that all parties have a fair and
21
complete understanding of the result of the settlement agreement. It is not in the interest of
22
justice to have a misunderstanding about the basic question of whether the Plaintiff will receive
23
any money from a settlement.
24
25
26
27
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
September 17, 2018
/s/
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?