Wyatt v. Sundaram

Filing 4

ORDER of INTRADISTRICT TRANSFER from Sacramento (2:15-cv-1181 DAD) to Fresno (1:15-cv-0895 SKO) signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 6/11/15. (Dillon, M)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 RICKY WYATT, 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 No. 2:15-cv-1181 DAD P v. ORDER SUNDARAM, 15 Defendant. 16 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed a civil rights action pursuant to 42 17 18 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff has not filed a request to proceed in forma pauperis or paid the filing fee. 19 In his complaint, plaintiff alleges violations of his civil rights by defendant Dr. Sundaram. 20 The alleged violations took place in Kings County, which is part of the Fresno Division of the 21 United States District Court for the Eastern District of California. See Local Rule 120(d). Pursuant to Local Rule 120(f), a civil action which has not been commenced in the proper 22 23 division of a court may, on the court’s own motion, be transferred to the proper division of the 24 court. Therefore, this action will be transferred to the Fresno Division of the court. 25 Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 26 1. This action is transferred to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of 27 California sitting in Fresno; and 28 ///// 1 1 2 2. All future filings shall reference the new Fresno case number assigned and shall be filed at: United States District Court Eastern District of California 2500 Tulare Street Fresno, CA 93721 3 4 5 6 Dated: June 11, 2015 7 8 9 DAD:9:md wyat1181.22 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?