Wyatt v. Sundaram
Filing
4
ORDER of INTRADISTRICT TRANSFER from Sacramento (2:15-cv-1181 DAD) to Fresno (1:15-cv-0895 SKO) signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 6/11/15. (Dillon, M)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
RICKY WYATT,
12
Plaintiff,
13
14
No. 2:15-cv-1181 DAD P
v.
ORDER
SUNDARAM,
15
Defendant.
16
Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed a civil rights action pursuant to 42
17
18
U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff has not filed a request to proceed in forma pauperis or paid the filing fee.
19
In his complaint, plaintiff alleges violations of his civil rights by defendant Dr. Sundaram.
20
The alleged violations took place in Kings County, which is part of the Fresno Division of the
21
United States District Court for the Eastern District of California. See Local Rule 120(d).
Pursuant to Local Rule 120(f), a civil action which has not been commenced in the proper
22
23
division of a court may, on the court’s own motion, be transferred to the proper division of the
24
court. Therefore, this action will be transferred to the Fresno Division of the court.
25
Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
26
1. This action is transferred to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of
27
California sitting in Fresno; and
28
/////
1
1
2
2. All future filings shall reference the new Fresno case number assigned and shall be
filed at:
United States District Court
Eastern District of California
2500 Tulare Street
Fresno, CA 93721
3
4
5
6
Dated: June 11, 2015
7
8
9
DAD:9:md
wyat1181.22
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?