Lobato v. Wilkins Root Beer Drive-In, Inc.

Filing 15

STIPULATION for Dismissal of Action; ORDER, signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 1/19/16. CASE CLOSED. (Gonzalez, R)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 Tanya E. Moore, SBN 206683 MOORE LAW FIRM, P.C. 332 North Second Street San Jose, California 95112 Telephone (408) 298-2000 Facsimile (408) 298-6046 Email: service@moorelawfirm.com Attorney for Plaintiff Rachel Lobato 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 RACHEL LOBATO, 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Plaintiff, vs. WILKINS ROOT BEER DRIVE-IN, INC., dba WILKIN’S DRIVE-IN, Defendant. ) No. 1:15-cv-00909-BAM ) ) STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL OF ) ACTION; ORDER ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 1 IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between Plaintiff Rachel Lobato and Defendant 2 Wilkins Root Beer Drive-In, Inc., dba Wilkin’s Drive-In, the parties to this action, by and 3 through their respective counsel, that pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), the above-captioned action be dismissed with prejudice in its entirety. Each 5 party is to bear its own attorneys’ fees and costs. 6 7 Dated: January 15, 2016 8 MOORE LAW FIRM, P.C. /s/ Tanya E. Moore Tanya E. Moore Attorney for Plaintiff, Rachel Lobato 9 10 11 12 Dated: January 15, 2016 RAIMONDO & ASSOCIATES /s/ Jasmine Shams Jasmine Shams Attorneys for Defendant, Wilkins Root Beer Drive-In, Inc., dba Wilkin’s Drive-In 13 14 15 16 17 ORDER 18 19 20 21 22 The parties having so stipulated and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this action be dismissed with prejudice in its entirety. Each party shall bear its own attorney’s fees and costs. ALL pending dates are Vacated. The Clerk of the Court is instructed to close this case. 23 24 IT IS SO ORDERED. 25 26 27 28 Dated: January 19, 2016 /s/ Barbara A. McAuliffe UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?