Bird v. Zuniga et al

Filing 14

ORDER denying 10 Request to withdraw Consent to Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng on 5/17/2016. (Lundstrom, T)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 11 12 13 14 CASE NO. 1:15-cv-00910--MJS (PC) MICHAEL BIRD, Plaintiff, v. A. ZUNIGA, et al., ORDER DENYING REQUEST TO WITHDRAW CONSENT TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE JURISDICTION (ECF No. 10) Defendants. 15 16 17 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil 18 rights action brought pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1983. The action proceeds against 19 Defendant Musleh on Plaintiff’s Eighth Amendment failure to protect claim. Service on 20 Defendant Musleh is pending. 21 On July 6, 2015, Plaintiff consented to have a United States Magistrate Judge 22 conduct all further proceedings in this case, including trial and entry of final judgment, 23 pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c)(1). (ECF No. 6.) Defendant has yet to appear in the 24 action. Before the Court is Plaintiff’s May 13, 2016 request to withdraw his consent to 25 Magistrate Judge jurisdictioin. 26 “A party to a federal civil case has, subject to some exceptions, a constitutional 27 right to proceed before an Article III judge.” Dixon v. Ylst, 990 F.2d 478, 479 (9th Cir. 28 2003). This right can be waived, allowing parties to consent to have any and all further 1 proceedings conducted before a Magistrate Judge. Id. at 479-80. There is no absolute 2 right to withdraw consent to proceeding before a Magistrate Judge. Id. at 480. Instead, a 3 motion to withdraw consent may be granted only for good cause or a showing of 4 extraordinary circumstances. Id.; see also 28 U.S.C. § 636(c)(4). 5 6 Here, Plaintiff provides no basis for seeking to withdraw his consent. Accordingly, his request is HEREBY DENIED. 7 8 9 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: May 17, 2016 /s/ 10 Michael J. Seng UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?