Bird v. Zuniga et al
Filing
14
ORDER denying 10 Request to withdraw Consent to Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng on 5/17/2016. (Lundstrom, T)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
10
11
12
13
14
CASE NO. 1:15-cv-00910--MJS (PC)
MICHAEL BIRD,
Plaintiff,
v.
A. ZUNIGA, et al.,
ORDER DENYING REQUEST TO
WITHDRAW CONSENT TO MAGISTRATE
JUDGE JURISDICTION
(ECF No. 10)
Defendants.
15
16
17
Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil
18
rights action brought pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1983. The action proceeds against
19
Defendant Musleh on Plaintiff’s Eighth Amendment failure to protect claim. Service on
20
Defendant Musleh is pending.
21
On July 6, 2015, Plaintiff consented to have a United States Magistrate Judge
22
conduct all further proceedings in this case, including trial and entry of final judgment,
23
pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c)(1). (ECF No. 6.) Defendant has yet to appear in the
24
action. Before the Court is Plaintiff’s May 13, 2016 request to withdraw his consent to
25
Magistrate Judge jurisdictioin.
26
“A party to a federal civil case has, subject to some exceptions, a constitutional
27
right to proceed before an Article III judge.” Dixon v. Ylst, 990 F.2d 478, 479 (9th Cir.
28
2003). This right can be waived, allowing parties to consent to have any and all further
1
proceedings conducted before a Magistrate Judge. Id. at 479-80. There is no absolute
2
right to withdraw consent to proceeding before a Magistrate Judge. Id. at 480. Instead, a
3
motion to withdraw consent may be granted only for good cause or a showing of
4
extraordinary circumstances. Id.; see also 28 U.S.C. § 636(c)(4).
5
6
Here, Plaintiff provides no basis for seeking to withdraw his consent. Accordingly,
his request is HEREBY DENIED.
7
8
9
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
May 17, 2016
/s/
10
Michael J. Seng
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?