California Sportfishing Protection Alliance et al v. United States Bureau of Reclamation et al

Filing 62

ORDER TO DISMISS CLAIMS and CLOSE CASE signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 11/10/2015. CASE CLOSED. (Jessen, A)

Download PDF
1 2 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 4 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 5 6 7 CALIFORNIA SPORTFISHING PROTECTION ALLIANCE, et al., 1:15-cv-00912 LJO BAM ORDER TO DISMISS CLAIMS AND CLOSE CASE. Plaintiffs, 8 v. 9 UNITED STATES BUREAU OF 10 RECLAMATION, et al., 11 Defendants. 12 13 On October 20, 2015, this Court issued a Memorandum Decision and Order granting Federal 14 Defendants’ motion to dismiss the remaining claims in this case for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. 15 Doc. 60. Plaintiffs were given an opportunity to to file a supplemental brief demonstrating why leave to 16 amend should be permitted. Id. at 22. Instead of doing so, Plaintiffs elected not to seek leave to file an 17 amended complaint. Doc. 61. Accordingly, 18 (1) Federal Defendants’ motion to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction pursuant 19 to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(1) is GRANTED WITHOUT LEAVE TO AMEND; and 20 (2) The Clerk of Court is directed to CLOSE THIS CASE. 21 22 IT IS SO ORDERED. 23 Dated: /s/ Lawrence J. O’Neill November 10, 2015 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 24 25 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?