Roach v. Tate Publishing & Enterprises, LLC et al

Filing 33

ORDER RE STATUS REPORT. The parties shall file the next status report no later then December 1, 2016, and every ninety days thereafter until the stay in this action is lifted. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 9/6/2016. (Hernandez, M)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 TERRI HAYNES ROACH, Plaintiff, 12 13 14 Case No. 1:15-cv-00917-SAB ORDER RE STATUS REPORT v. (ECF No. 32) TATE PUBLISHING & ENTERPRISES, LLC, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 18 This action is stayed while the parties participate in arbitration. On February 24, 2016, an 19 order issued requiring the parties to file a status report every ninety days. (ECF No. 28.) On 20 May 27, 2016, an order issued directing the parties to file a status report because ninety days had 21 passed and the parties’ status report had not been filed. (ECF No. 29.) On May 31, 2016, the 22 parties filed a status report. (ECF No. 30.) On June 1, 2016, an order issued requiring the parties 23 to file a status report on September 1, 2016. (ECF No. 31.) 24 However, the status report was not filed until September 6, 2016, and no party sought an 25 extension of time. The parties are advised that any further failures to file status reports in 26 compliance with the Court’s orders may result in the issuance of sanctions. The Court’s 27 deadlines are not mere suggestions. In the September 6, 2016 status report, Plaintiff requested 28 that the next status report be due on December 1, 2016. Accordingly, the parties shall file the 1 1 next status report no later than December 1, 2016, and every ninety days thereafter until the stay 2 in this action is lifted. 3 4 IT IS SO ORDERED. 5 Dated: September 6, 2016 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?