Roach v. Tate Publishing & Enterprises, LLC et al
Filing
38
ORDER SETTING STATUS CONFERENCE FOR JANUARY 9, 2017. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 12/16/2016. (Hernandez, M)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
TERRI HAYNES ROACH,
Plaintiff,
12
13
Case No. 1:15-cv-00917-SAB
ORDER SETTING STATUS CONFERENCE
FOR JANUARY 9, 2017
v.
(ECF No. 37)
14
TATE PUBLISHING & ENTERPRISES,
LLC, et al.,
15
Defendants.
16
17
18
On December 15, 2016, Plaintiff filed a status report indicating that she has been
19 informed that Defendants have still failed to pay their arbitration dues. (ECF No. 37.) The
20 Federal Arbitration Act provides that an action may be stayed for the parties to arbitrate in a suit
21 that is referable to arbitration under an arbitration agreement “providing the applicant for the stay
22 is not in default in proceeding with such arbitration.” 9 U.S.C. § 3.
23
On November 16, 2016, a telephonic conference was held at which the Court addressed
24 the issue of Defendants’ failure to pay arbitration dues. Based upon the status report filed on
25 December 15, 2016, Defendants have failed to resolve the issue. The parties shall be required to
26 appear for a status conference to address the status of arbitration and whether the stay of this
27 action should be lifted.
A parry may appear telephonically for the hearing by contacting
28 Courtroom Deputy Mamie Hernandez at (559) 499-5672 to obtain the teleconference number
1
1 and teleconference code prior to the hearing.
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the parties shall appear for a status
2
3 conference on January 9, 2017 at 2:30 p.m. in Courtroom 9.
4
5
IT IS SO ORDERED.
6 Dated:
December 16, 2016
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?