Gonzales v. Podsakoff, et al.

Filing 39

ORDER Granting Defendants' Request for Extension of Time to Respond to the First Amended Complaint signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 05/19/2017. (Flores, E)

1
2
3
4

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

5

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

6
7
8

MICHAEL GONZALES,

9
10

v.

11
12

Case No. 1:15-cv-00924 SKO
Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’
REQUEST FOR EXTENSION OF TIME
TO RESPOND TO THE FIRST
AMENDED COMPLAINT
(Doc. 36)

PODSAKOFF, et al.,

13

Defendants.

14
15

On May 17, 2017, Defendants filed a request for an extension of time relieving them of

16

their obligation to respond to Plaintiff’s First Amended Complaint until thirty days after the Court

17

rules on their notice of related cases and request for consolidation of this action with Gonzales v.

18

Ferrso et al., E.D. Cal. No. 1:16-cv-01813-EPG.

19

Good cause appearing, Defendants’ first request for an extension of time to respond to the

20

First Amended Complaint (Doc. 36) is GRANTED; Defendants are relieved of their obligation to

21

respond to Plaintiff’s First Amended Complaint until thirty days after the Court rules on their

22

request for consolidation (Doc. 35).

23
24

IT IS SO ORDERED.

25

Dated:

May 19, 2017

/s/

Sheila K. Oberto

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

26
27
28
1

.