Gonzales v. Podsakoff, et al.

Filing 39

ORDER Granting Defendants' Request for Extension of Time to Respond to the First Amended Complaint signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 05/19/2017. (Flores, E)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 8 MICHAEL GONZALES, 9 10 v. 11 12 Case No. 1:15-cv-00924 SKO Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ REQUEST FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO THE FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT (Doc. 36) PODSAKOFF, et al., 13 Defendants. 14 15 On May 17, 2017, Defendants filed a request for an extension of time relieving them of 16 their obligation to respond to Plaintiff’s First Amended Complaint until thirty days after the Court 17 rules on their notice of related cases and request for consolidation of this action with Gonzales v. 18 Ferrso et al., E.D. Cal. No. 1:16-cv-01813-EPG. 19 Good cause appearing, Defendants’ first request for an extension of time to respond to the 20 First Amended Complaint (Doc. 36) is GRANTED; Defendants are relieved of their obligation to 21 respond to Plaintiff’s First Amended Complaint until thirty days after the Court rules on their 22 request for consolidation (Doc. 35). 23 24 IT IS SO ORDERED. 25 Dated: May 19, 2017 /s/ Sheila K. Oberto UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 26 27 28 1 .

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?