Villery v. Garcia et al
Filing
16
ORDER Finding Service of Complaint Appropriate as to Defendants Rodriguez, Lindsay, Granillo, Dagama, Stewart, and Miller for Retaliation and Dismissing all other Claims and Defendants for Failure to State a Cognizable Claim for Relief signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 11/03/2015. (Flores, E)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
JARED VILLERY,
12
13
14
15
Plaintiff,
v.
EDWARD GARCIA, et al.,
Defendants.
16
17
18
19
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No.: 1:15-cv-00936-LJO-SAB (PC)
ORDER FINDING SERVICE OF COMPLAINT
APPROPRIATE AS TO DEFENDANTS
RODRIGUEZ, LINDSEY, GRANILLO, DAGAMA,
STEWART, AND MILLER FOR RETALIATION
AND DISMISSING ALL OTHER CLAIMS AND
DEFENDANTS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A
COGNIZABLE CLAIM FOR RELIEF
[ECF Nos. 13, 14, 15]
Plaintiff Jared Villery is appearing pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action
pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983.
On October 21, 2015, the Court screened Plaintiff’s first amended complaint and found that
20
Plaintiff stated a cognizable retaliation claim against Defendants George Rodriguez, Bryan Lindsey,
21
Edward Granillo, Brian Dagama, David Stewart and Ryan Miller. (ECF No. 14.) The Court found that
22
Plaintiff failed to state any other cognizable claims for relief. (Id.) The Court directed Plaintiff to file
23
a second amended complaint or notify the Court of his intent to proceed on the claim found to be
24
cognizable. (Id.)
25
On November 2, 2015, Plaintiff notified the Court of his intent to proceed only on the
26
retaliation claim against Defendants George Rodriguez, Bryan Lindsey, Edward Granillo, Brian
27
Dagama, David Stewart, and Ryan Miller and dismiss all other claims and defendants from the action
28
for failure to state a cognizable claim for relief. (ECF No. 15.)
1
1
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
2
1.
This action shall proceed on Plaintiff’s claim of retaliation against Defendants George
3
Rodriguez, Bryan Lindsey, Edward Granillo, Brian Dagama, David Stewart, and Ryan
4
Miller;
5
2.
cognizable claim for relief; and
6
7
8
9
10
11
All other claims and Defendants are DISMISSED from the action for failure to state a
3.
The matter is referred back to the Magistrate Judge for initiation of service of process
by the United States marshal.
IT IS SO ORDERED
Dated: November 3, 2015
/s/ Lawrence J. O’Neill
United States District Judge
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?