Goff v. Gamez et al

Filing 102

ORDER DENYING 100 Plaintiff's Motion Requesting Partial Court Transcripts at Government Expense signed by Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean on 1/10/2020. (Jessen, A)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

8

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

9
10

THOMAS L. GOFF,

11

Plaintiff,

12

v.

13

Case No. 1:15-cv-00937-AWI-EPG (PC)
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION
REQUESTING PARTIAL COURT
TRANSCRIPTS AT GOVERNMENT
EXPENSE

GAMEZ, et al.,

14

Defendants.

(ECF NO. 100)

15
16

Thomas Goff (“Plaintiff”) is a former state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma

17
18

pauperis in this civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This action was

19

dismissed for failure to prosecute on November 8, 2019. (ECF Nos. 89 & 90).

20

On January 9, 2020, Plaintiff filed a motion requesting partial court transcripts at

21

government expense. (ECF No. 100). For the reasons described below, Plaintiff’s motion will

22

be denied.

23

I.

24
25

LEGAL STANDARD FOR PREPARATION OF A TRANSCRIPT AT THE
GOVERNMENT’S EXPENSE
28 U.S.C. § 1915(c) states that, “[u]pon the filing of an affidavit in accordance with

26

subsections (a) and (b) and the prepayment of any partial filing fee as may be required under

27

subsection (b), the court may direct payment by the United States of the expenses of (1)

28

printing the record on appeal in any civil or criminal case, if such printing is required by the
1

1

appellate court; (2) preparing a transcript of proceedings before a United States magistrate

2

judge in any civil or criminal case, if such transcript is required by the district court, in the case

3

of proceedings conducted under section 636(b) of this title or under section 3401(b) of title 18,

4

United States Code; and (3) printing the record on appeal if such printing is required by the

5

appellate court, in the case of proceedings conducted pursuant to section 636(c) of this title.

6

Such expenses shall be paid when authorized by the Director of the Administrative Office of

7

the United States Courts.”

8

Section 1915(a) states:

9

(1) Subject to subsection (b), any court of the United States may authorize the
commencement, prosecution or defense of any suit, action or proceeding, civil or
criminal, or appeal therein, without prepayment of fees or security therefor, by a
person who submits an affidavit that includes a statement of all assets such
prisoner possesses that the person is unable to pay such fees or give security
therefor. Such affidavit shall state the nature of the action, defense or appeal and
affiant's belief that the person is entitled to redress.

10
11
12
13

(2) A prisoner seeking to bring a civil action or appeal a judgment in a civil action
or proceeding without prepayment of fees or security therefor, in addition to filing
the affidavit filed under paragraph (1), shall submit a certified copy of the trust
fund account statement (or institutional equivalent) for the prisoner for the 6month period immediately preceding the filing of the complaint or notice of
appeal, obtained from the appropriate official of each prison at which the prisoner
is or was confined.

14
15
16
17
18

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 753(f), “[f]ees for transcripts furnished in [civil]

19
20

proceedings to persons permitted to appeal in forma pauperis shall also be paid by the

21

United States if the trial judge or a circuit judge certifies that the appeal is not frivolous

22

(but presents a substantial question).” See also Maloney v. E. I. DuPont de Nemours &

23

Co., 396 F.2d 939, 940 (D.C. Cir. 1967); Henderson v. United States, 734 F.2d 483, 484

24

(9th Cir. 1984). “A substantial question exists where the issue before the court of appeals

25

is reasonably debatable.” Tuggles v. City of Antioch, C08–01914JCS, 2010 WL

26

3955784 (N.D. Cal. Oct.8, 2010) (internal citations and quotations omitted); see also

27

Randle v. Franklin, No. CV-08-00845-JAT, 2012 WL 201757, at *2 (E.D. Cal. Jan. 23,

28

2012).
2

1

II.

2

DISCUSSION
It is not entirely clear what Plaintiff is requesting. Plaintiff states that he is requesting

3

“partial transcripts,” but then appears to state that he wants “[a]ll transcripts, motions, exhibits,

4

and telephonic/in person conferences, oral and written, settlement offers by defense; prior

5

application for appeal: 9th Cir. COA # 17-16932 (ECF #’s 14 to 34), then only ECF #’s 75 to

6

87, as the Court had provided partial transcripts upon request on 12-11-19 (ECF # 91).” (ECF

7

No. 100, p. 1). Later in the motion, Plaintiff only appears to request: “1) 9th Cir. COA Appeal

8

# 17-16932[, and] 2) Eastern District ECF #s: 14 to 34, 66 to 68, 75 to 87….” (ECF No. 100,

9

p. 3).1
Plaintiff’s motion will be denied. First, it is not clear if Plaintiff is even requesting

10
11

transcripts. Plaintiff states that he is requesting transcripts, but later in the motion only requests

12

docketed documents. Second, even if Plaintiff is requesting transcripts, Plaintiff failed to

13

identify any particular transcript that he believes is relevant to his appeal, and after reviewing

14

the docket, it is not clear to the Court that there are any relevant transcripts.
As to Plaintiff’s request for docketed documents, those requests will be denied.

15
16

Plaintiff has already received copies of the documents he is requesting, and Plaintiff has not

17

explained why he needs additional copies or why he is unable to get those copies himself.

18

Moreover, Plaintiff failed to explain how the documents he is requesting are relevant to his

19

appeal.

20

\\\

21

\\\

22

\\\

23

\\\

24

\\\

25

\\\

26
27
28

In his motion, Plaintiff also asserts that “entry # 87” was “made confidential” contrary to a court order.
(ECF No. 100, p. 2). Plaintiff is incorrect. The Court ordered both parties to submit confidential settlement
conference statements (ECF No. 84, p. 2), and the docket entry at ECF No. 87 is Defendant’s notice of compliance
with that order.
1

3

1
2
3

III.

ORDER
Based on the foregoing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff’s motion requesting

partial court transcripts at government expense is DENIED.

4
5
6

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:

January 10, 2020

/s/
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
4