Villery v. California Department of Corrections, et al.
Filing
84
ORDER ADOPTING 58 Findings and Recommendations to Deny Plaintiff's 57 Emergency Motion Under the All Writs Act, signed by District Judge Dale A. Drozd on 4/23/18. (Marrujo, C)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
JARED M. VILLERY,
12
Plaintiff,
13
14
No. 1:15-cv-00987-DAD-BAM
v.
JEFFREY BEARD, et al.,
15
ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND
RECOMMENDATIONS TO DENY
PLAINTIFF’S EMERGENCY MOTION
UNDER THE ALL WRITS ACT
Defendant.
16
(Doc. Nos. 57, 58)
17
Plaintiff Jared M. Villery is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in
18
19
this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This matter was referred to a United States
20
Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.
On January 24, 2018, the assigned magistrate judge issued findings and recommendations
21
22
recommending that plaintiff’s emergency motion for an extraordinary writ under the All Writs
23
Act, 28 U.S.C. § 1651, seeking to prevent his transfer to a different institution of confinement, be
24
denied. (Doc. No. 58.) Plaintiff was directed to file any objections to the findings and
25
recommendations within fourteen days. No objections were filed within the time permitted.
In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 304, the
26
27
court has conducted a de novo review of plaintiff’s request. Having carefully reviewed the entire
28
/////
1
1
file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and proper
2
analysis.
3
Accordingly:
4
1. The findings and recommendations issued on January 24, 2018 (Doc. No. 58) are
5
6
adopted in full; and
2. Plaintiff’s emergency motion for an extraordinary writ under the All Writs Act, 28
7
8
9
U.S.C. § 1651 (Doc. No. 57) is denied.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
April 23, 2018
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?