Lindblom v. Santander Consumer USA Inc. et al

Filing 36

ORDER CONTINUING deadline for reply and vacating hearing date, documents 31 and 35 . Accordingly, the Court hereby ORDERS: Western Union shall have through and including 11/23/2015, to file its reply brief in further support of its motion to di smiss and the hearing on the motion to dismiss, currently noticed for 11/23/2015, is VACATED. Upon expiration of the revised reply deadline, the matter will be submitted for decision on the papers pursuant to Local Rule 230(g). Order signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 11/16/2015. (Rooney, M)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, FRESNO DIVISION 6 7 APRIL LINDBLOM 8 Case No. 1:15-CV-00990-LJO-BAM Plaintiff, 9 v. 10 SANTANDER CONSUMER USA, INC., and WESTERN UNION BUSINESS 11 SOLUTIONS (USA), LLC 12 ORDER CONTINUING DEADLINE FOR REPLY AND VACATING HEARING DATE Defendants. 13 14 The Court, having reviewed Defendant Western Union Business Solutions (USA), LLC 15 (“Western Union’s”) Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to File Reply Brief and to Continue 16 Hearing on Motion to Dismiss, and finding good cause appearing, therefore GRANTS the motion. 17 Accordingly, the Court hereby ORDERS: 18 1. Western Union shall have through and including November 23, 2015, to file its Reply 19 Brief in further support of its Motion to Dismiss. 20 2. The hearing on the motion to dismiss is VACATED. Upon expiration of the revised 21 Reply deadline, and the matter will be submitted for decision on the papers pursuant to Local Rule 22 230(g). 23 24 IT IS SO ORDERED. 25 26 27 28 Dated: November 16, 2015 /s/ Lawrence J. O’Neill UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?