Fulfer v. WinCo Holdings, Inc.
Filing
24
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 5/19/16 ORDERING that the deadline for Expert Disclosures is 8/22/2016, the deadline for rebuttal expert disclosures is 9/22/16, the deadline for fact Discovery is 11/22/2016, and the d eadline to file Dispositive Motion is 1/12/2017. The Final Pretrial Conference is SET for 3/23/2017 at 02:00 PM in Courtroom 2, and Trial shall commence on 5/15/2017 at 09:00 AM in Courtroom 2 (TLN) before District Judge Troy L. Nunley.(Mena-Sanchez, L)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
NEDA N. DAL CIELO, Bar No. 161982
ndalcielo@littler.com
ANNE SWEENEY JORDAN, Bar No. 273589
ajordan@littler.com
LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C.
50 W. San Fernando, 15th Floor
San Jose, CA 95113.2303
Telephone: 408.998.4150
Fax No.:
408.288.5686
Attorneys for Defendant
WINCO HOLDINGS, INC. (erroneously
named as WinCo Foods Foundation, Inc.)
ROMAN OTKUPMAN, CSBN 249423
roman@OLFLA.com
RITA LEONG, CSBN 300058
rita@OLFLA.com
OTKUPMAN LAW FIRM
5950 Canoga Ave., Suite 550
Woodland Hills, California 91367
Telephone: 818.293.5623
Fax No.:
888.850.1310
Attorneys for Plaintiff
BRADLEY FULFER
15
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
16
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
17
SACRAMENTO DIVISION
18
BRADLEY FULFER, an individual,
19
20
21
22
23
Plaintiff,
v.
WINCO FOODS FOUNDATION,
INC., an Idaho Corporation, and
DOES 1 through 100, inclusive,
Case No. 1:15-cv-00999-TLN-EPG
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO
CONTINUE DISCOVERY AND
DISPOSITIVE MOTION
DEADLINES
Defendants.
24
25
26
27
28
LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C.
50 W. San Fernando, 15th
Floor
San Jose, CA 95113.2303
408.998.4150
Case No. 1:15-CV-00999-TLN-EPG
STIP AND ORDER TO CONTINUE DISCOVERY AND DISPOSITIVE MTN DEADLINES
1
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by and between Plaintiff Bradley Fulfer
2
(“Plaintiff”) and Defendant WinCo Holdings, Inc. (erroneously sued as Winco Food
3
Foundation, Inc.) (“WinCo”) as follows:
4
WHEREAS, on May 14, 2015, Plaintiff filed this action against WinCo,
5
asserting various claims, including (1) disability discrimination, (2) failure to
6
accommodate, (3) failure to engage in the interactive process, (4) retaliation, (5)
7
intentional infliction of emotional distress, (6) failure to prevent discrimination, (7)
8
wrongful termination, and (8) interference with his ability to take leave.
9
10
WHEREAS, pursuant to the Court’s November 6, 2015, Pre-Trial
Scheduling Order, pre-trial deadlines are as follows:
11
Expert witness disclosures were set for March 22, 2016;
12
Rebuttal
13
expert
witness
disclosures
were
set for April 22, 2016;
14
Fact discovery cut off was set for June 22, 2016;
15
Dispositive motions were set for July 22, 2016;
16
The last hearing date for a motion was set for August 22, 2016;
17
The final pretrial conference was set for October 31, 2016 at
18
1:30 p.m.; and
19
Trial was scheduled to commence on January 27, 2017. [Dkt. #18];
20
WHEREAS, on January 8, 2016, this case was reassigned from Judge
21
Garland E. Burrell, Jr. to Judge Troy L. Nunley. [Dkt. #19];
22
WHEREAS, Despite the Parties’ best efforts, the Parties have been
23
unable to complete written discovery and take the necessary depositions of the parties;
24
WHEREAS, the Parties are interested in engaging in Alternative Dispute
25
26
27
28
LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C.
50 W. San Fernando, 15th
Floor
San Jose, CA 95113.2303
408.998.4150
Resolution and productive, good faith, settlement negotiations;
WHEREAS, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 16(b)(4), the
Court may modify a scheduling order where good cause is present; and
WHEREAS, in order to further the Parties’ interest in exploring
2.
Case No. 1:15-CV-00999-TLN-EPG
STIP AND ORDER TO CONTINUE DISCOVERY AND DISPOSITIVE MTN DEADLINES
1
Alternative Dispute Resolution, the Parties jointly request that the discovery cut-off
2
remain open so that meaningful discovery can continue, and that the dispositive
3
motion deadline be extended.
4
THEREFORE IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the
5
Parties, through their respective counsel, that the Parties jointly request that the Court
6
continue the deadlines set forth in the Case Management Order [Dkt. 18] by extending
7
the following deadlines:
8
Expert disclosures to August 22, 2016;
9
Rebuttal expert disclosures to September 22, 2016;
10
Fact discovery to November 22, 2016;
11
Dispositive motions to December 22, 2016;
12
The last hearing date to January 22, 2017;
13
Final pretrial conference to March 31, 2017; and
14
Trial to commence on May 15, 2017.
15
16
Dated: May 12, 2016
Respectfully submitted,
17
/s/Neda N. Dal Cielo
NEDA N. DAL CIELO
ANNE SWEENEY JORDAN
LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C.
Attorneys for Defendant
WINCO HOLDINGS, INC. (erroneously
named as WinCo Foods Foundation, Inc.)
18
19
20
21
22
Dated: May 12, 2016
Respectfully submitted,
23
24
25
26
27
/s/Roman Otkupman
ROMAN OTKUPMAN
RITA LEONG
OTKUPMAN LAW FIRM
Attorneys for Plaintiff
BRADLEY FULFER
28
LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C.
50 W. San Fernando, 15th
Floor
San Jose, CA 95113.2303
408.998.4150
3.
Case No. 1:15-CV-00999-TLN-EPG
STIP AND ORDER TO CONTINUE DISCOVERY AND DISPOSITIVE MTN DEADLINES
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
ORDER
The court, having considered the Parties’ stipulation to continue
discovery and dispositive motion deadlines, hereby orders that the deadline for expert
disclosures is August 22, 2016, the deadline for rebuttal expert disclosures is
September 22, 2016, the deadline for fact discovery is November 22, 2016, and the
deadline to file a dispositive motion to January 12, 2017.
The Final pretrial
conference is set for March 23, 2017 at 2:00 pm in Courtroom 2, and Trial shall
commence on May 15, 2017 at 9:00 am in Courtroom 2.
10
11
IT IS SO ORDERED.
12
13
Dated: May 19, 2016
14
Troy L. Nunley
United States District Judge
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C.
50 W. San Fernando, 15th
Floor
San Jose, CA 95113.2303
408.998.4150
4.
Case No. 1:15-CV-00999-TLN-EPG
STIP AND ORDER TO CONTINUE DISCOVERY AND DISPOSITIVE MTN DEADLINES
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?