Fulfer v. WinCo Holdings, Inc.

Filing 24

STIPULATION and ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 5/19/16 ORDERING that the deadline for Expert Disclosures is 8/22/2016, the deadline for rebuttal expert disclosures is 9/22/16, the deadline for fact Discovery is 11/22/2016, and the d eadline to file Dispositive Motion is 1/12/2017. The Final Pretrial Conference is SET for 3/23/2017 at 02:00 PM in Courtroom 2, and Trial shall commence on 5/15/2017 at 09:00 AM in Courtroom 2 (TLN) before District Judge Troy L. Nunley.(Mena-Sanchez, L)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 NEDA N. DAL CIELO, Bar No. 161982 ndalcielo@littler.com ANNE SWEENEY JORDAN, Bar No. 273589 ajordan@littler.com LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C. 50 W. San Fernando, 15th Floor San Jose, CA 95113.2303 Telephone: 408.998.4150 Fax No.: 408.288.5686 Attorneys for Defendant WINCO HOLDINGS, INC. (erroneously named as WinCo Foods Foundation, Inc.) ROMAN OTKUPMAN, CSBN 249423 roman@OLFLA.com RITA LEONG, CSBN 300058 rita@OLFLA.com OTKUPMAN LAW FIRM 5950 Canoga Ave., Suite 550 Woodland Hills, California 91367 Telephone: 818.293.5623 Fax No.: 888.850.1310 Attorneys for Plaintiff BRADLEY FULFER 15 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 16 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 17 SACRAMENTO DIVISION 18 BRADLEY FULFER, an individual, 19 20 21 22 23 Plaintiff, v. WINCO FOODS FOUNDATION, INC., an Idaho Corporation, and DOES 1 through 100, inclusive, Case No. 1:15-cv-00999-TLN-EPG STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE DISCOVERY AND DISPOSITIVE MOTION DEADLINES Defendants. 24 25 26 27 28 LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C. 50 W. San Fernando, 15th Floor San Jose, CA 95113.2303 408.998.4150 Case No. 1:15-CV-00999-TLN-EPG STIP AND ORDER TO CONTINUE DISCOVERY AND DISPOSITIVE MTN DEADLINES 1 IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by and between Plaintiff Bradley Fulfer 2 (“Plaintiff”) and Defendant WinCo Holdings, Inc. (erroneously sued as Winco Food 3 Foundation, Inc.) (“WinCo”) as follows: 4 WHEREAS, on May 14, 2015, Plaintiff filed this action against WinCo, 5 asserting various claims, including (1) disability discrimination, (2) failure to 6 accommodate, (3) failure to engage in the interactive process, (4) retaliation, (5) 7 intentional infliction of emotional distress, (6) failure to prevent discrimination, (7) 8 wrongful termination, and (8) interference with his ability to take leave. 9 10 WHEREAS, pursuant to the Court’s November 6, 2015, Pre-Trial Scheduling Order, pre-trial deadlines are as follows: 11  Expert witness disclosures were set for March 22, 2016; 12  Rebuttal 13 expert witness disclosures were set for April 22, 2016; 14  Fact discovery cut off was set for June 22, 2016; 15  Dispositive motions were set for July 22, 2016; 16  The last hearing date for a motion was set for August 22, 2016; 17  The final pretrial conference was set for October 31, 2016 at 18 1:30 p.m.; and 19  Trial was scheduled to commence on January 27, 2017. [Dkt. #18]; 20 WHEREAS, on January 8, 2016, this case was reassigned from Judge 21 Garland E. Burrell, Jr. to Judge Troy L. Nunley. [Dkt. #19]; 22 WHEREAS, Despite the Parties’ best efforts, the Parties have been 23 unable to complete written discovery and take the necessary depositions of the parties; 24 WHEREAS, the Parties are interested in engaging in Alternative Dispute 25 26 27 28 LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C. 50 W. San Fernando, 15th Floor San Jose, CA 95113.2303 408.998.4150 Resolution and productive, good faith, settlement negotiations; WHEREAS, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 16(b)(4), the Court may modify a scheduling order where good cause is present; and WHEREAS, in order to further the Parties’ interest in exploring 2. Case No. 1:15-CV-00999-TLN-EPG STIP AND ORDER TO CONTINUE DISCOVERY AND DISPOSITIVE MTN DEADLINES 1 Alternative Dispute Resolution, the Parties jointly request that the discovery cut-off 2 remain open so that meaningful discovery can continue, and that the dispositive 3 motion deadline be extended. 4 THEREFORE IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the 5 Parties, through their respective counsel, that the Parties jointly request that the Court 6 continue the deadlines set forth in the Case Management Order [Dkt. 18] by extending 7 the following deadlines: 8  Expert disclosures to August 22, 2016; 9  Rebuttal expert disclosures to September 22, 2016; 10  Fact discovery to November 22, 2016; 11  Dispositive motions to December 22, 2016; 12  The last hearing date to January 22, 2017; 13  Final pretrial conference to March 31, 2017; and 14  Trial to commence on May 15, 2017. 15 16 Dated: May 12, 2016 Respectfully submitted, 17 /s/Neda N. Dal Cielo NEDA N. DAL CIELO ANNE SWEENEY JORDAN LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C. Attorneys for Defendant WINCO HOLDINGS, INC. (erroneously named as WinCo Foods Foundation, Inc.) 18 19 20 21 22 Dated: May 12, 2016 Respectfully submitted, 23 24 25 26 27 /s/Roman Otkupman ROMAN OTKUPMAN RITA LEONG OTKUPMAN LAW FIRM Attorneys for Plaintiff BRADLEY FULFER 28 LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C. 50 W. San Fernando, 15th Floor San Jose, CA 95113.2303 408.998.4150 3. Case No. 1:15-CV-00999-TLN-EPG STIP AND ORDER TO CONTINUE DISCOVERY AND DISPOSITIVE MTN DEADLINES 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 ORDER The court, having considered the Parties’ stipulation to continue discovery and dispositive motion deadlines, hereby orders that the deadline for expert disclosures is August 22, 2016, the deadline for rebuttal expert disclosures is September 22, 2016, the deadline for fact discovery is November 22, 2016, and the deadline to file a dispositive motion to January 12, 2017. The Final pretrial conference is set for March 23, 2017 at 2:00 pm in Courtroom 2, and Trial shall commence on May 15, 2017 at 9:00 am in Courtroom 2. 10 11 IT IS SO ORDERED. 12 13 Dated: May 19, 2016 14 Troy L. Nunley United States District Judge 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C. 50 W. San Fernando, 15th Floor San Jose, CA 95113.2303 408.998.4150 4. Case No. 1:15-CV-00999-TLN-EPG STIP AND ORDER TO CONTINUE DISCOVERY AND DISPOSITIVE MTN DEADLINES

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?