Caputo v. Kern County Sheriff's Office

Filing 10

ORDER Requiring Plaintiff to Provide Additional Information Regarding His Motion for Relief of Medical Neglect, Medical Negligence and Medical Abuse 8 , signed by Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean on 9/22/16: 7-Day Deadline. (Hellings, J)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 11 BRIAN CAPUTO, Plaintiff, 12 v. 13 14 KERN COUNTY SHERIFF’S OFFICE, Defendant. 15 ORDER REQURING PLAINTIFF TO PROVIDE ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REGARDING HIS MOTION FOR RELIEF OF MEDICAL NEGLECT, MEDICAL NEGLIGENCE, AND MEDICAL ABUSE (ECF NO. 8) SEVEN-DAY DEADLINE 16 17 1:15-cv-01008-EPG (PC) I. 18 BACKGROUND Brian Caputo (“Plaintiff”) is a prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this 19 civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. ' 1983. 20 Complaint on September 19, 2016. The First Amended Complaint has not yet been screened. Plaintiff filed a First Amended 21 On September 19, 2016, Plaintiff also filed a Motion for Relief of Medical Neglect, 22 Medical Negligence, and Medical Abuse (“the Motion”). (ECF No. 8). Without ruling on the 23 merits of Plaintiff’s motion, the Court requests additional information from Plaintiff to assist 24 the Court’s consideration. 25 II. PLAINTIFF’S MOTION 26 Plaintiff is presently incarcerated at the Kern County Jail in Bakersfield, California. 27 According to Plaintiff, he had to be rushed to the Kern Medical Center on July 7, 2016. 28 Plaintiff was told by the neurologist that “the veins/blood vessals [sic] in my brain flaired [sic] 1 1 up three times their normal size, and to follow up within one week.” However, Plaintiff’s next 2 appointment was scheduled for November of 2016. Plaintiff has allegedly not been getting any 3 form of medical treatment, and his medical needs have been neglected. 4 III. ANALYSIS 5 It is the Court’s understanding that when a pre-trial detainee awaiting trial is 6 complaining of inadequate medical care, the first step is often that his or her attorney contacts 7 the prison/jail to inquire about the matter. The Court notes that Plaintiff has an attorney (Eric 8 A. Chase) representing him in his criminal case. 9 Plaintiff did not state in his Motion whether he went through this procedure before filing the 10 Motion, and what if any response was received. The Court requests this information for a 11 better understanding of Plaintiff’s situation and the need for Court intervention, especially 12 considering that Plaintiff does not have a complaint with this Court that has passed the 13 screening stage. 14 IV. (Case No. 1:14-cr-00041-LJO-SKO). CONCLUSION 15 In accordance with the above, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 16 1. Within seven days from the date of this order, Plaintiff shall notify the Court, 17 in writing, what efforts if any have been made by Plaintiff and Plaintiff’s 18 counsel to secure appropriate medical care and what response, if any, Plaintiff 19 and his counsel have received. 20 2. 21 Failure to comply with this order may lead to the Motion being denied on that ground. 22 23 24 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: September 22, 2016 /s/ UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?