Caputo v. Kern County Sheriff's Office

Filing 16

ORDER Requiring Response from the Kern County Sherriff's Office Regarding Plaintiff's Motion for Relief of Medical Neglect, Medical Negligence, and Meidcal Abuse, signed by Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean on 10/6/16. 14-Day Deadline. (Verduzco, M)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 BRIAN CAPUTO, 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. 14 KERN COUNTY SHERIFF’S OFFICE, 15 Defendant. 16 1:15-cv-01008-EPG (PC) ORDER REQUIRING RESPONSE FROM THE KERN COUNTY SHERRIFF’S OFFICE REGARDING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR RELIEF OF MEDICAL NEGLECT, MEDICAL NEGLIGENCE, AND MEDICAL ABUSE (ECF NO. 8) 14-DAY DEADLINE 17 18 19 Brian Caputo (“Plaintiff”) is a prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this 20 civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff filed a First Amended Complaint 21 on September 19, 2016. The First Amended Complaint has not yet been screened, and at this 22 time the Court is not making any determination regarding the viability of Plaintiff’s complaint. 23 On September 19, 2016, Plaintiff filed a Motion for Relief of Medical Neglect, Medical 24 Negligence, and Medical Abuse (“the Motion”). (ECF No. 8). The Court construes the Motion 25 as a motion for preliminary injunctive relief. 26 According to the Motion, Plaintiff is presently incarcerated at the Kern County Jail in 27 Bakersfield, California. He had to be rushed to the Kern Medical Center on July 7, 2016. He was 28 told by the neurologist that “the veins/blood vessals [sic] in my brain flaired [sic] up three times 1 1 their normal size, and to follow up within one week.” However, his next appointment was 2 scheduled for November of 2016. He has allegedly not been getting any form of medical 3 treatment, and his medical needs have been neglected for “so long.” 4 Because the Motion did not provide enough information, the Court ordered Plaintiff to 5 provide additional information. (ECF No. 10). On September 29, 2016, Plaintiff filed a response 6 to the Court’s order, as well as supporting evidence. (ECF Nos. 12 & 13). 7 8 9 10 11 While the First Amended Complaint has not yet been screened, in light of Plaintiff’s representation that he has an urgent medical need, the Court requires a response from the Kern County Sherriff’s Office. In accordance with the above, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. Within fourteen (14) days from the date of service of this order, the Kern County Sherriff’s Office is to file a response to the Motion to address, to the extent able, 12 Plaintiff’s representation that he is in urgent need of medical attention, which 13 has been unaddressed; and 14 2. 15 The Clerk of the Court is directed to serve the Kern County Sherriff’s Office with: a. A copy of this order; 16 b. A copy of the Motion (ECF No. 8); 17 c. A copy of Plaintiff’s response to the Court’s order docketed on September 23, 18 2016 (ECF No. 12); and 19 d. A copy of Plaintiff’s evidence in support of his response to the Court’s order 20 docketed on September 23, 2016 (ECF No. 13). 21 22 23 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: October 6, 2016 /s/ UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?