Caputo v. Kern County Sheriff's Office
Filing
53
ORDER DIRECTING Service of Subpoena by the United States Marshals Service Without Prepayment of Costs, signed by Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean on 7/20/17. (Marrujo, C)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
BRIAN CAPUTO,
12
Plaintiff,
13
v.
14
Case No. 1:15-cv-01008-EPG (PC)
ORDER DIRECTING SERVICE OF
SUBPOENA BY THE UNITED STATES
MARSHALS SERVICE WITHOUT
PREPAYMENT OF COSTS
GONZALEZ,
15
Defendant.
(ECF NO. 52)
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
The Court previously granted Plaintiff’s motion for the issuance of a subpoena upon
Kern County Sherriff’s Office by the United States Marshal without prepayment of costs.
(ECF No. 51). Plaintiff has now completed and returned the subpoena and form USM-285.
(ECF No. 52).
Accordingly, it is HEREBY ORDERED that:
1. The Clerk of the Court shall forward the following documents to the United States
Marshals Service:
a. One (1) completed and issued subpoena duces tecum (ECF No. 52);
b. One (1) completed USM-285 form (ECF No. 52); and
c. Two (2) copies of this order, one to accompany the subpoena and one for the
28
1
1
United States Marshals Service.
2
2. Within TWENTY (20) DAYS from the date of this order, the United States
3
Marshals Service SHALL effect personal service of the subpoena, along with a copy
4
of this order, upon the entity named in the subpoena pursuant to Rule 45 of the
5
Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and 28 U.S.C. § 566(c).
6
3. The United States Marshals Service is DIRECTED to retain a copy of the subpoena
7
8
in its file for future use.
4. Within TEN (10) DAYS after personal service is effected, the United States
9
Marshals Service SHALL file the return of service.
10
11
12
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
July 20, 2017
/s/
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?