Caputo v. Kern County Sheriff's Office

Filing 53

ORDER DIRECTING Service of Subpoena by the United States Marshals Service Without Prepayment of Costs, signed by Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean on 7/20/17. (Marrujo, C)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 BRIAN CAPUTO, 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. 14 Case No. 1:15-cv-01008-EPG (PC) ORDER DIRECTING SERVICE OF SUBPOENA BY THE UNITED STATES MARSHALS SERVICE WITHOUT PREPAYMENT OF COSTS GONZALEZ, 15 Defendant. (ECF NO. 52) 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 The Court previously granted Plaintiff’s motion for the issuance of a subpoena upon Kern County Sherriff’s Office by the United States Marshal without prepayment of costs. (ECF No. 51). Plaintiff has now completed and returned the subpoena and form USM-285. (ECF No. 52). Accordingly, it is HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. The Clerk of the Court shall forward the following documents to the United States Marshals Service: a. One (1) completed and issued subpoena duces tecum (ECF No. 52); b. One (1) completed USM-285 form (ECF No. 52); and c. Two (2) copies of this order, one to accompany the subpoena and one for the 28 1 1 United States Marshals Service. 2 2. Within TWENTY (20) DAYS from the date of this order, the United States 3 Marshals Service SHALL effect personal service of the subpoena, along with a copy 4 of this order, upon the entity named in the subpoena pursuant to Rule 45 of the 5 Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and 28 U.S.C. § 566(c). 6 3. The United States Marshals Service is DIRECTED to retain a copy of the subpoena 7 8 in its file for future use. 4. Within TEN (10) DAYS after personal service is effected, the United States 9 Marshals Service SHALL file the return of service. 10 11 12 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: July 20, 2017 /s/ UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?