Applegate v. Robicheaux et al

Filing 14

ORDER Requiring Plaintiff to File a Report or Second Amended Complaint signed by Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean on 10/06/2016. (Flores, E)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 11 BRIAN APPLEGATE, Plaintiff, 12 13 14 v. MARLENE ROBICHEAUX, et al., 1:15-cv-01016-LJO-EPG (PC) ORDER REQURING PLAINTIFF TO FILE A REPORT OR SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT THIRTY-DAY DEADLINE Defendants. 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Brian Applegate (“Plaintiff”) is a prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. ' 1983. Plaintiff’s initial complaint was screened, and was dismissed with leave to amend. (ECF No. 8). Plaintiff filed an amended complaint on September 28, 2015. (ECF No. 9). The amended complaint has not yet been screened. The Court notes that on August 15, 2016, Plaintiff voluntarily dismissed a similar case, seemingly because at least one of the issues Plaintiff complained of was resolved. Voluntary Dismissal, Applegate v. N. Clark, et al., No. 1:15-cv-00207-LJO-EPG (E.D. Cal. Aug. 15, 2016), ECF No. 21. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that: 1. Plaintiff is to file a written report with this Court within thirty days from the date of the service this order. The report should state whether any of the 1 1 issues in this case have been resolved and whether Plaintiff intends to proceed 2 on Plaintiff’s First Amended complaint. 3 2. 4 5 In the alternative, Plaintiff may file a Second Amended Complaint to reflect any changes in the scope of the claims or relief sought. 3. Failure to comply with this order may result in this case being dismissed. 6 7 8 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: October 6, 2016 /s/ UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?