Becky Greer et al v. Pacific Gas and Electric Company

Filing 168

STIPULATION and ORDER as follows: Based on the stipulation between Defendants Pacific Gas and Electric Company and IBEW Local 1245, Defendants may file an amended compendium of evidence in connection with their motions for summary judgment. Defendant s shall, to the extent possible, maintain the pagination of the amended compendium such that the page citations in their motions for summary judgment remain accurate. The amended compendium will not replace the original compendium (ECF No. 156 ) on the docket, but will be used in consideration of Defendants' motions for summary judgment and any motions thereafter. Order signed by Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean on 6/12/2017. (Rooney, M)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9

LEONARD CARDER, LLP
Philip C. Monrad #151073
Paul H. Schwartz # 215214
1330 Broadway, Suite 1450
Oakland, CA 94612
Telephone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]

IBEW LOCAL UNION 1245
Alex Pacheco #302852
30 Orange Tree Circle
Vacaville, CA 95687
Telephone: [phone]

LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C.
Joshua D. Kienitz #244903
Aurelio J. Perez #282135
333 Bush Street, 34th Floor
San Francisco, California 94104
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: 415.399.8490

10
11

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

12

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

13
14
15

BECKY GREER; TIMOTHY C. BUDNIK;
ROSARIO SAENZ; HALEY MARKWITH
IAN CARTY; and MARIA GARCIA
PESINA, Individually and as “Class
Representatives,”

18
19
20

STIPULATION BY IBEW LOCAL
1245 AND PG&E RE RE-FILING
OF COMPENDIUM OF
EVIDENCE (DKT. 156) IN LIGHT
OF COURT ORDER (DKT. 166);
ORDER

Plaintiffs,

16
17

Case No. 1:15-CV-01066—EPG

v.
PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC
COMPANY; IBEW LOCAL 1245, and
DOES 1 through 10, inclusive,
Defendants.

21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

{7608/002/00712335.DOCX}
1
STIPULATION AND ORDER RE RE-FILING OF COMPENDIUM (DKT. 156) IN LIGHT OF DKT. 166
Firmwide:148086356.1 048517.1064

1
2

Defendants Pacific Gas and Electric Company and IBEW Local 1245 hereby stipulate
as follows:

3

1. Defendants are willing to re-file the Compendium of Evidence (Dkt. 156

4

[“Compendium”]) to exclude deposition corrections and errata sheets stricken by the

5

Court’s June 1, 2017, Order (Dkt. 166). Specifically, the Court ordered that: “The

6

deposition corrections listed in Exh. A to the Toole Declaration (ECF No. 148-2) are

7

stricken.”

8

2. Defendants submit that the Compendium should be re-filed to replace Dkt. 156, in a

9

manner so that the pagination of Dkt. 156 does not change. For example, in the

10

Compendium, Dkt. 156-3, Tab O, pp. 1070-1071 consists of pp. 54-55 of the Becky

11

Greer deposition transcript. This (Dkt. 156-3, Tab O, pp. 1070-1071) will still be the

12

correct citation to pp. 54-55 of the transcript of Ms. Greer’s deposition, in a re-filed

13
14
15
16
17

Compendium.
3. The re-filed Compendium shall include clean original transcript pages (i.e., without
handwritten corrections) for all deposition transcript corrections that are subject to the
Court’s order (Dkt. 166). Further, the errata sheets filed with the initial Compendium
shall be re-filed, but with all stricken corrections redacted, to ensure that the pagination

18
remains the same as in the originally filed Compendium.
19
4. Defendants agree that Defendant PG&E shall promptly re-file the Compendium via
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

ECF, in accordance with the above stipulation, provided that the Court approves the
above stipulation and orders the Compendium to be re-filed. Alternatively, if the Court
does not believe that the above-described re-filing of the Compendium is necessary,
Defendants shall not re-file the Compendium.
5. In meet and confer correspondence initiated by Local 1245 shortly after Dkt. 166
issued, Defendants made this offer (to re-file the Compendium) to Plaintiffs. Although
Plaintiffs’ counsel stated in a June 5, 2017, 6:33 p.m. email that “Plaintiffs have made,
{7608/002/00712335.DOCX}
2
STIPULATION AND ORDER RE RE-FILING OF COMPENDIUM (DKT. 156) IN LIGHT OF DKT. 166
Firmwide:148086356.1 048517.1064

1

and continue to make, the request that the Compendium comply with the court order,”

2

Plaintiffs, after extensive meet and confer, declined to join in any stipulation regarding

3

the re-filing of the Compendium. Defendant Local 1245 shall promptly submit the full

4
5

email meet and confer history on this topic, if requested by the Court.
SO STIPULATED BY:
DATED: JUNE 7, 2017
LITTLER
MENDELSON, P.C.

6

By: /s/
Robert G. Hulteng
Joshua D. Kienitz
Aurelio J. Perez
Attorneys for Defendant, Pacific Gas &
Electric Company

7
8
9
10
11

DATED: JUNE 7, 2017

By: /s/
Philip C. Monrad
Paul H. Schwartz

12
13
14

LEONARD CARDER, LLP

DATED JUNE 7, 2017

15

IBEW LOCAL 1245
By: /s/
Alex J. Pacheco
Attorneys for Defendant, IBEW Local 1245

16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

{7608/002/00712335.DOCX}
3
STIPULATION AND ORDER RE RE-FILING OF COMPENDIUM (DKT. 156) IN LIGHT OF DKT. 166
Firmwide:148086356.1 048517.1064

ORDER

1
2

Based on the above stipulation, Defendants may file an amended compendium of

3

evidence in connection with their motions for summary judgment. Defendants shall, to the

4

extent possible, maintain the pagination of the amended compendium such that the page

5

citations in their motions for summary judgment remain accurate. The amended compendium

6

will not replace the original compendium (ECF No. 156) on the docket, but will be used in

7

consideration of Defendants’ motions for summary judgment and any motions thereafter.

8
IT IS SO ORDERED.
9
10

Dated:

June 12, 2017

/s/
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

{7608/002/00712335.DOCX}
4
STIPULATION AND ORDER RE RE-FILING OF COMPENDIUM (DKT. 156) IN LIGHT OF DKT. 166
Firmwide:148086356.1 048517.1064