McKinley v. Commissioner of Social Security

Filing 19

ORDER GRANTING 18 Plaintiff's Request for a Second Extension of Time, signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 6/21/2016. Opening brief due by 6/27/2016. (Hall, S)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 CHRISTINE MCKINLEY, 12 13 14 Plaintiff, v. CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Acting Commissioner of Social Security, 15 Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No.: 1:15-cv-01078- JLT ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S REQUEST FOR A SECOND EXTENSION OF TIME (Doc. 18) 16 17 On June 21, 2016, the parties filed a stipulation for an extension of time for Plaintiff to file an 18 opening brief. (Doc. 18) Notably, the Scheduling Order permits a single extension by the stipulation 19 of parties (Doc. 8 at 4), which was previously used by Plaintiff related to the opening brief. (Doc. 16) 20 Beyond the single thirty-day extension, “requests to modify [the scheduling] order must be made by 21 written motion and will be granted only for good cause.” (Doc. 8 at 4) Therefore, the Court construes 22 the stipulation of the parties to be a motion by Plaintiff for modification of the Scheduling Order. 23 Plaintiff’s counsel asserts the further extension of seven days is necessary because she recently 24 suffered an illness was unable to comply with the prior deadline for filing an opening brief in the 25 matter. (Doc. 18 at 1) In addition, Defendant does not oppose the request for the brief extension of 26 time. (Id.) 27 Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: 28 1. Plaintiff’s request for a second extension of time is GRANTED; and 1 1 2. Plaintiff SHALL file an opening brief no later than June 27, 2016. 2 3 4 5 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: June 21, 2016 /s/ Jennifer L. Thurston UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?