McKinley v. Commissioner of Social Security
Filing
19
ORDER GRANTING 18 Plaintiff's Request for a Second Extension of Time, signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 6/21/2016. Opening brief due by 6/27/2016. (Hall, S)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
CHRISTINE MCKINLEY,
12
13
14
Plaintiff,
v.
CAROLYN W. COLVIN,
Acting Commissioner of Social Security,
15
Defendant.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No.: 1:15-cv-01078- JLT
ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S REQUEST
FOR A SECOND EXTENSION OF TIME
(Doc. 18)
16
17
On June 21, 2016, the parties filed a stipulation for an extension of time for Plaintiff to file an
18
opening brief. (Doc. 18) Notably, the Scheduling Order permits a single extension by the stipulation
19
of parties (Doc. 8 at 4), which was previously used by Plaintiff related to the opening brief. (Doc. 16)
20
Beyond the single thirty-day extension, “requests to modify [the scheduling] order must be made by
21
written motion and will be granted only for good cause.” (Doc. 8 at 4) Therefore, the Court construes
22
the stipulation of the parties to be a motion by Plaintiff for modification of the Scheduling Order.
23
Plaintiff’s counsel asserts the further extension of seven days is necessary because she recently
24
suffered an illness was unable to comply with the prior deadline for filing an opening brief in the
25
matter. (Doc. 18 at 1) In addition, Defendant does not oppose the request for the brief extension of
26
time. (Id.)
27
Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED:
28
1.
Plaintiff’s request for a second extension of time is GRANTED; and
1
1
2.
Plaintiff SHALL file an opening brief no later than June 27, 2016.
2
3
4
5
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
June 21, 2016
/s/ Jennifer L. Thurston
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?