Cochran v. Aguirre, et al.
Filing
64
ORDER DENYING Plaintiff's Second 63 Motion to Stay the Proceedings and Withdraw Opposition to Motion for Summary Judgment, signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 10/24/16. (Marrujo, C)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
BILLY COY COCHRAN,
12
Plaintiff,
13
14
v.
E. AGUIRRE,
15
Defendant.
16
Case No.: 1:15-cv-01092-AWI-SAB (PC)
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S SECOND
MOTION TO STAY THE PROCEEDINGS AND
WITHDRAW OPPOSITION TO MOTION FOR
SUMMARY JUDGMENT
[ECF No. 63]
Plaintiff Billy Coy Cochran is appearing pro se in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C.
17
18
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
§ 1983.
Currently before the Court is Plaintiff’s motion to stay the proceedings and withdraw his
19
20
opposition to Defendant’s motion for summary judgment, filed October 21, 2016. Plaintiff requests
21
the Court stay the proceedings until prison officials return his legal property.
As previously stated in denying Plaintiff’s first motion to stay the proceedings to until the
22
23
return of his legal property, “Plaintiff fails to demonstrate what documents are necessary to oppose
24
Defendant’s pending motion for summary judgment for failure to exhaust the administrative remedies
25
or how the documents submitted by Defendant’s are not sufficient to resolve the motion.” (See Def.’s
26
Mot. Summ. J., Attach. Exs., ECF No. 52.) Plaintiff again fails to demonstrate what documents are
27
///
28
///
1
1
necessary to supplement his opposition to the motion and/or how the documents already submitted are
2
not sufficient to resolve the motion. Accordingly, Plaintiff’s second motion to stay the proceedings is
3
DENIED.
4
5
IT IS SO ORDERED.
6
Dated:
7
October 24, 2016
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?