Gonzalez v. Razo et al
Filing
15
ORDER Denying 14 Motion to Proceed in Forma Pauperis as Moot, signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 8/25/15. (Verduzco, M)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
MANUEL ANTONIO GONZALEZ,
12
Plaintiff,
13
ORDER DENYING MOTION TO PROCEED
IN FORMA PAUPERIS AS MOOT
v.
14
1:15-cv-01098-LJO-SKO (PC)
J. RAZO, et al.,
(Docs. 13 and 14)
15
Defendants.
16
17
On August 21, 2015, Plaintiff filed a motion seeking leave to proceed in forma pauperis in
18
this action. 28 U.S.C. § 1915. (Doc. 14.) However, the $400.00 filing fee was paid in full on
19
August 19, 2015, pursuant to Judge Beck’s order directing that the filing fee submitted by
20
Plaintiff in his now-closed case, 1:15-cv-00680-DLB (PC), be applied to this case. (Doc. 13.)
21
Accordingly, Plaintiff’s motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is moot and it is HEREBY
22
DENIED on that ground.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
23
24
Dated:
/s/ Lawrence J. O’Neill
August 25, 2015
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
25
26
27
28
1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?