Mock v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, et al.

Filing 22

Stipulation To Continue The Mandatory Scheduling Conference. The Initial Scheduling Conference is now set for January 21, 2016 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 6 (MJS) before Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng, signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng on 10/13/2015. (Yu, L)

1
2
3
4
5
6

KAMALA D. HARRIS, State Bar No. 146672
Attorney General of California
DAVID J. NEILL, State Bar No. 186997
Supervising Deputy Attorney General
MATTHEW T. BESMER, State Bar No. 269138
Deputy Attorney General
2550 Mariposa Mall, Room 5090
Fresno, CA 93721
Telephone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
E-mail: [e-mail]
Attorneys for Defendants CDCR and PVSP

7
8

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

MAURICE C. MOCK,

12
13

v.

1:15-cv-01104-JMS
Plaintiff, STIPULATION TO CONTINUING THE
MANDATORY SCHEDULING
CONFERENCE

14
15
16
17
18

CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF
CORRECTIONS AND
REHABILITATION; PLEASANT
VALLEY STATE PRISON; JEFFREY A
BEARD, in official capacity; JOHN KEITH,
in his individual and official capacities; and
DOES 1 through 50, inclusive,

Date:
Time:
Dept:
Judge:
Action Filed:

October 22, 2015
10:30 a.m.
6
Michael J. Seng
6/15/2015

Defendants.

19
20
21

The mandatory scheduling conference is currently set for October 22, 2015 at 10:30 a.m.
22
See Doc. 3. Plaintiff filed his first amended complaint on October 6, 2015 (Doc. 16, 19), in
23
24

response to the Court’s ruling on Defendants California Department of Corrections and
Rehabilitation’s, Pleasant Valley State Prison’s, and Jeffrey Beard’s motion to dismiss and strike.

25
See Doc. 4.
26
27
28

The Order Setting Mandatory Scheduling Conference provides that the Court is unable to
conduct the scheduling conference until all defendants have been served. See Doc. 3. Plaintiff
1
Stipulation to Continuing the Mandatory Scheduling Conference (1:15-cv-01104-MJS)

1

has not yet served defendant John Keith. The parties are currently working out an arrangement

2

regarding service of Mr. Keith and the due date of defendants’ response to Plaintiff’s first

3

amended complaint.

4

until after Mr. Keith has been served, and the pleadings have closed.

The parties believe it is prudent to continue the mandatory scheduling

5

BASED ON THE FOREGOING, the parties stipulate as follows:

6

1.

7

The mandatory scheduling conference should be continued until January 21, 2016,

at 10:00 a.m.

8
9

SO STIPULATED.

10
11

Dated: October 9, 2015

Respectfully submitted,

12

14

Kamala D. Harris
Attorney General of California
David J. Neill
Supervising Deputy Attorney General

15

Matthew T. Besmer

16

Matthew T. Besmer
Deputy Attorney General
Attorneys for Defendants CDCR and PVSP

13

17
18
19
20

Dated: October 9, 2015

KAHN, SOARES & CONWAY, LLP

21

Robert B. Zumwalt

22
Richard C. Conway
Robert B. Zumwalt
Attorneys for Plaintiff

23
24
25
26
27
28
2

Stipulation to Continuing the Mandatory Scheduling Conference (1:15-cv-01104-MJS)

1
2

ORDER
Good cause appearing, the parties’ Stipulation to Continue the Mandatory Scheduling

3

Conference in Case No. 1:15-cv-1104-MJS is hereby approved and adopted as the Order of this

4

Court. The Scheduling Conference is continued until January 21, 2016, at 10:00 a.m.

5
6
7

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:

October 13, 2015

/s/

8

Michael J. Seng

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
Stipulation to Continuing the Mandatory Scheduling Conference (1:15-cv-01104-MJS)