Lobato v. Riar et al

Filing 14

STIPULATION and ORDER for Extension of Time for PAUL RIAR aka SURINDER PAUL SINGH RIAR, individually and dba ROEDING PARK SHELL; MAHJA BUSINESS SOLUTIONS, a California corporation, dba ROEDING PARK SHELL; and SIMERJIT RIAR TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT: to answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint shall be extended up to and including October 12, 2015. ORDER CONTINUING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE HEARING: SCHEDULING CONFERENCE is continued from October 20, 2015 to November 30, 2015 at 9 :30 a.m. in Courtroom 8 (BAM) before Judge McAuliffe. Joint Scheduling Conference Statement must be electronically filed 7 days before the hearing date and shall be emailed, in Word format, to [e-mail]. signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 9/30/2015. (Herman, H)

1
2
3
4
5

Bruce A. Neilson #096952
7108 N. Fresno St. #410
Fresno, California 93720
Telephone [phone]
Facsimile [phone]
Attorney for Defendants
Paul Riar, Simerjit Riar and Mahja
Business Solutions

6
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

7

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

8

*****

9
10

RACHEL LOBATO,
Plaintiff,

11
12

vs.

13

PAUL RIAR aka SURINDER PAUL
SINGH RIAR, individually and dba
ROEDING PARK SHELL; MAHJA
BUSINESS SOLUTIONS, a California
corporation, dba ROEDING PARK
SHELL; SIMERJIT RIAR;

14
15
16
17
18

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

CASE NO. 1:15-cv-01127--BAM
STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR
EXTENSION OF TIME FOR PAUL
RIAR aka SURINDER PAUL SINGH
RIAR, individually and dba ROEDING
PARK SHELL; MAHJA BUSINESS
SOLUTIONS, a California corporation,
dba ROEDING PARK SHELL; and
SIMERJIT RIAR TO RESPOND TO
COMPLAINT
ORDER CONTINUING SCHEDULING
CONFERENCE HEARING

Defendants.
____________________________________

19

WHEREAS:

20

1.

Plaintiff RACHEL LOBATO filed her complaint in this action on July 20, 2015.

21

2.

This is the second request for an extension of time for PAUL RIAR aka SURINDER

22

PAUL SINGH RIAR, individually and dba ROEDING PARK SHELL; MAHJA BUSINESS

23

SOLUTIONS, a California corporation, dba ROEDING PARK SHELL; and SIMERJIT RIAR

24

(“Defendants”). A previous extension of time was granted by the plaintiff within the statutory

25

allowance; thus, court approval is required for a further extension of time.

26

3.

Plaintiff and Defendants are in settlement negotiations at this time.

27

4.

Defendants have had a CASp inspection performed and report prepared, however a

28

supplemental report that will affect a proposed settlement is being prepared and should be

available within a week to 10 days.
1

5.

The parties agree that settlement of this case would save valuable court time and resources.

2

6.

The parties have agreed to extend Defendants’ time to respond to the complaint until

3

October 12, 2015, subject to the court's approval, and believe that the case can be settled within

4

that time.

5

7.

6

the mandatory scheduling conference.

7

This extension of time will not alter any date or event already set by Court order, including

NOW THEREFORE, Defendants through their attorneys, and Plaintiff JOSE ESCOBEDO

8

through his attorneys, hereby stipulate and agree that the time for PAUL RIAR aka SURINDER

9

PAUL SINGH RIAR, individually and dba ROEDING PARK SHELL; MAHJA BUSINESS

10

SOLUTIONS, a California corporation, dba ROEDING PARK SHELL; and SIMERJIT RIAR to

11

answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint shall be extended up to and including October 12,

12

2015, pending court approval.

13
14

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

15
16

Dated: September 29, 2015

MOORE LAW FIRM, PC
/s/Tanya Moore
Tanya Moore, Attorney for Plaintiff Rachel Lobato

17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

Dated: September 29, 2015

/s/Bruce A. Neilson
Bruce A. Neilson, Attorney for Defendants
Paul Riar, Simerjit Riar and Mahja Business
Solutions

1

ORDER

2
IT IS SO ORDERED that Defendants through their attorneys, and Plaintiff JOSE

3
4
5
6
7
8

ESCOBEDO through his attorneys, hereby stipulate and agree that the time for PAUL RIAR aka
SURINDER PAUL SINGH RIAR, individually and dba ROEDING PARK SHELL; MAHJA
BUSINESS SOLUTIONS, a California corporation, dba ROEDING PARK SHELL; and
SIMERJIT RIAR to answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint shall be extended up to and
including October 12, 2015, pending court approval.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Scheduling Conference is continued from October

9
10

20, 2015 to November 30, 2015 at 9:30 a.m. in Courtroom 8 (BAM) before Judge McAuliffe. J

11

Joint Scheduling Conference Statement must be electronically filed 7 days before the hearing date

12

and shall be emailed, in Word format, to [e-mail].

13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:

September 30, 2015

/s/ Barbara A. McAuliffe
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE