Enriquez v. University of Phoenix et al
Filing
31
SCHEDULING ORDER, signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 2/17/2016. Consent/Decline due within 10 days. Pleading Amendment Deadline 4/17/2016. Discovery Deadlines: Initial Disclosures 3/3/2016; Non-Expert 8/5/2016; Expert 10/7/2016. Mi d-Discovery Status Conference set for 5/17/2016 at 09:30 AM in Bakersfield at 510 19th Street (JLT) before Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston. Non-Dispositive Motion Deadlines: Filed by 10/21/2016; Hearing by 11/18/2016. Dispositive Motion Dea dlines: Filed by 11/1/2016; Hearing by 11/29/2016. Settlement Conference set for 12/12/2016 at 01:30 PM in Bakersfield at 510 19th Street (JLT) before Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston. Pretrial Conference set for 1/10/2017 at 09:30 AM in Courtroom 5 (DAD) before District Judge Dale A. Drozd. Jury Trial set for 3/7/2017 at 01:30 PM in Courtroom 5 (DAD) before District Judge Dale A. Drozd. (Hall, S)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
10
ARIANA ENRIQUEZ,
11
Plaintiff,
12
13
14
15
v.
UNIVERSITY OF PHOENIX, et al.,
Defendants.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No.: 1:15-CV-01131 - DAD - JLT
SCHEDULING ORDER (Fed. R. Civ. P. 16)
Pleading Amendment Deadline: 4/17/2016
Discovery Deadlines:
Initial Disclosures: 3/3/2016
Non-Expert: 8/5/2016
Expert: 10/7/2016
Mid-Discovery Status Conference:
5/17/2016 at 9:30 a.m.
16
17
Non-Dispositive Motion Deadlines:
Filing: 10/21/2016
Hearing: 11/18/2016
18
19
Dispositive Motion Deadlines:
Filing: 11/1/2016
Hearing: 11/29/2016
20
21
22
Settlement Conference:
12/12/2016 at 1:30 p.m.
510 19th Street, Bakersfield, CA
23
24
26
Pre-Trial Conference:
1/10/2017 at 9:30 a.m.
Courtroom 5
27
Trial:
25
28
1
3/7/2017 at 1:30 p.m.
Courtroom 5
Jury trial: 2-3 days
1
I.
February 17, 2016.
2
3
Date of Scheduling Conference
II.
Appearances of Counsel
4
Eric Ridley appeared on behalf of Plaintiff.
5
Gregory Martin and Thomas Quinn appeared on behalf of Defendants.
6
III.
Magistrate Judge Consent:
7
Notice of Congested Docket and Court Policy of Trailing
8
Due to the District Judges’ heavy caseload, the newly adopted policy of the Fresno Division of
9
the Eastern District is to trail all civil cases. The parties are hereby notified that for a trial date set
10
before a District Judge, the parties will trail indefinitely behind any higher priority criminal or older
11
civil case set on the same date until a courtroom becomes available. The trial date will not be reset to a
12
continued date.
The Magistrate Judges’ availability is far more realistic and accommodating to parties than that
13
14
of the U.S. District Judges who carry the heaviest caseloads in the nation and who must prioritize
15
criminal and older civil cases over more recently filed civil cases. A United States Magistrate Judge
16
may conduct trials, including entry of final judgment, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c), Federal Rule of
17
Civil Procedure 73, and Local Rule 305. Any appeal from a judgment entered by a United States
18
Magistrate Judge is taken directly to the United States Court of Appeal for the Ninth Circuit.
The Fresno Division of the Eastern District of California, whenever possible, is utilizing United
19
20
States Article III District Court Judges from throughout the nation as Visiting Judges. Pursuant to the
21
Local Rules, Appendix A, such reassignments will be random, and the parties will receive no advance
22
notice before their case is reassigned to an Article III District Court Judge from outside of the Eastern
23
District of California.
Therefore, the parties are directed to consider consenting to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction to
24
25
conduct all further proceedings, including trial. Within 10 days of the date of this order, counsel
26
SHALL file a consent/decline form (provided by the Court at the inception of this case) indicating
27
whether they will consent to the jurisdiction of the Magistrate Judge.
28
///
2
1
IV.
Pleading Amendment Deadline
Any requested pleading amendments are ordered to be filed, either through a stipulation or
2
3
motion to amend, no later than April 17, 2016.
4
V.
5
6
7
8
9
Discovery Plan and Cut-Off Date
The parties are ordered to exchange the initial disclosures required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(1)
on or before March 3, 2016.
The parties are ordered to complete all discovery pertaining to non-experts on or before August
5, 2016, and all discovery pertaining to experts on or before October 7, 2016.
The parties are directed to disclose all expert witnesses1, in writing, on or before August 12,
10
2016, and to disclose all rebuttal experts on or before September 9, 2016. The written designation of
11
retained and non-retained experts shall be made pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. Rule 26(a)(2), (A), (B),
12
and (C) and shall include all information required thereunder. Failure to designate experts in
13
compliance with this order may result in the Court excluding the testimony or other evidence offered
14
through such experts that are not disclosed pursuant to this order.
15
The provisions of Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(b)(4) and (5) shall apply to all discovery relating to experts
16
and their opinions. Experts must be fully prepared to be examined on all subjects and opinions
17
included in the designation. Failure to comply will result in the imposition of sanctions, which may
18
include striking the expert designation and preclusion of expert testimony.
19
20
21
The provisions of Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(e) regarding a party's duty to timely supplement
disclosures and responses to discovery requests will be strictly enforced.
A mid-discovery status conference is scheduled for May 17, 2016 at 9:30 a.m. before the
22
Honorable Jennifer L. Thurston, U.S. Magistrate Judge, located at 510 19th Street, Bakersfield,
23
California, 93301. A Joint Mid-Discovery Status Conference Report, carefully prepared and executed
24
by all counsel, shall be electronically filed in CM/ECF, one full week prior to the Conference, and shall
25
be e-mailed, in Word format, to JLTorders@caed.uscourts.gov. The joint statement SHALL outline the
26
discovery that has been completed and that which needs to be completed as well as any impediments to
27
1
28
In the event an expert will offer opinions related to an independent medical or mental health
evaluation, the examination SHALL occur sufficiently in advance of the disclosure deadline so the expert’s
report fully details the expert’s opinions in this regard.
3
1
completing the discovery within the deadlines set forth in this order. Counsel may appear via
2
CourtCall, providing a written request to so appear is made to the Magistrate Judge's Courtroom Clerk
3
no later than five court days before the noticed hearing date.
4
VI.
Pre-Trial Motion Schedule
All non-dispositive pre-trial motions, including any discovery motions, shall be filed no later
5
6
than October 21, 2016, and heard on or before November 18, 2016. Non-dispositive motions are
7
heard before the Honorable Jennifer L. Thurston, United States Magistrate Judge at the United States
8
Courthouse in Bakersfield, California.
No written discovery motions shall be filed without the prior approval of the assigned
9
10
Magistrate Judge. A party with a discovery dispute must first confer with the opposing party in a good
11
faith effort to resolve by agreement the issues in dispute. If that good faith effort is unsuccessful, the
12
moving party promptly shall seek a telephonic hearing with all involved parties and the Magistrate
13
Judge. It shall be the obligation of the moving party to arrange and originate the conference call to the
14
court. To schedule this telephonic hearing, the parties are ordered to contact Courtroom Deputy Clerk,
15
Susan Hall at (661) 326-6620 or via email at SHall@caed.uscourts.gov. Counsel must comply with
16
Local Rule 251 with respect to discovery disputes or the motion will be denied without prejudice
17
and dropped from calendar.
In scheduling such motions, the Magistrate Judge may grant applications for an order shortening
18
19
time pursuant to Local Rule 144(e). However, if counsel does not obtain an order shortening time, the
20
notice of motion must comply with Local Rule 251.
Counsel may appear and argue non-dispositive motions via CourtCall, providing a written
21
22
request to so appear is made to the Magistrate Judge's Courtroom Clerk no later than five court days
23
before the noticed hearing date.
All dispositive pre-trial motions shall be filed no later than November 1, 2016, and heard on or
24
25
before November 29, 2016, in Courtroom 5 at 8:30 a.m. before the Honorable Dale A. Drozd, United
26
States District Court Judge. In scheduling such motions, counsel shall comply with Fed. R. Civ. P. 56
27
and Local Rules 230 and 260.
28
///
4
1
VII.
Motions for Summary Judgment or Summary Adjudication
2
At least 21 days before filing a motion for summary judgment or motion for summary
3
adjudication, the parties are ORDERED to meet, in person or by telephone, to confer about the issues
4
to be raised in the motion.
5
The purpose of the meeting shall be to: 1) avoid filing motions for summary judgment where a
6
question of fact exists; 2) determine whether the respondent agrees that the motion has merit in whole
7
or in part; 3) discuss whether issues can be resolved without the necessity of briefing; 4) narrow the
8
issues for review by the court; 5) explore the possibility of settlement before the parties incur the
9
expense of briefing a summary judgment motion; and, 6) to develop a joint statement of undisputed
10
11
facts.
The moving party SHALL initiate the meeting and SHALL provide a complete, proposed
12
statement of undisputed facts at least five days before the conference. The finalized joint statement of
13
undisputed facts SHALL include all facts that the parties agree, for purposes of the motion, may be
14
deemed true. In addition to the requirements of Local Rule 260, the moving party shall file the joint
15
statement of undisputed facts.
16
In the notice of motion the moving party SHALL certify that the parties have met and conferred
17
as ordered above, or set forth a statement of good cause for the failure to meet and confer. Failure to
18
comply may result in the motion being stricken.
19
VIII. Pre-Trial Conference Date
20
January 10, 2017, at 9:30 a.m. in Courtroom 5 before Judge Drozd.
21
The parties are ordered to file a Joint Pretrial Statement pursuant to Local Rule 281(a)(2).
22
The parties are further directed to submit a digital copy of their pretrial statement in Word format,
23
directly to Judge Drozd's chambers, by email at DADorders@caed.uscourts.gov.
24
Counsels' attention is directed to Rules 281 and 282 of the Local Rules of Practice for the
25
Eastern District of California, as to the obligations of counsel in preparing for the pre-trial conference.
26
The Court will insist upon strict compliance with those rules. In addition to the matters set forth in the
27
Local Rules the Joint Pretrial Statement shall include a Joint Statement of the case to be used by the
28
Court to explain the nature of the case to the jury during voir dire.
5
1
IX.
March 7, 2017, at 1:30 p.m. in Courtroom 4 before the Honorable Dale A. Drozd, United States
2
3
Trial Date
District Court Judge.
4
A.
This is a jury trial.
5
B.
Counsels' Estimate of Trial Time: 2-3 days.
6
C.
Counsels' attention is directed to Local Rules of Practice for the Eastern District of
7
California, Rule 285.
8
X.
9
Settlement Conference
A Settlement Conference is scheduled for 1:30 p.m. on December 12, 2016 at 510 19th Street,
10
Bakersfield, California. The settlement conference will be conducted by Magistrate Judge Thurston. If
11
any party prefers that the settlement conference be conducted by a judicial officer who is not
12
normally assigned to this case, that party is directed to notify the Court no later than 60 days in
13
advance of the scheduled settlement conference to allow sufficient time for another judicial officer to
14
be assigned to handle the conference.
15
Unless otherwise permitted in advance by the Court, the attorneys who will try the case shall
16
appear at the Settlement Conference with the parties and the person or persons having full authority
17
to negotiate and settle the case on any terms2 at the conference. Consideration of settlement is a
18
serious matter that requires preparation prior to the settlement conference. Set forth below are the
19
procedures the Court will employ, absent good cause, in conducting the conference.
20
At least 21 before the settlement conference, Plaintiff SHALL submit to Defendant via fax or
21
e-mail, a written itemization of damages and a meaningful3 settlement demand which includes a brief
22
explanation of why such a settlement is appropriate. Thereafter, no later than 14 days before the
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Insurance carriers, business organizations, and governmental bodies or agencies whose settlement
agreements are subject to approval by legislative bodies, executive committees, boards of directors or the like
shall be represented by a person or persons who occupy high executive positions in the party organization and
who will be directly involved in the process of approval of any settlement offers or agreements. To the extent
possible the representative shall have the authority, if he or she deems it appropriate, to settle the action on
terms consistent with the opposing party's most recent demand.
3
“Meaningful” means that the offer is reasonably calculated to settle the case on terms acceptable to
the offering party. “Meaningful” does not include an offer which the offering party knows will not be
acceptable to the other party.
6
1
settlement conference, Defendant SHALL respond, via fax or e-mail, with an acceptance of the offer or
2
with a meaningful counteroffer, which includes a brief explanation of why such a settlement is
3
appropriate.
If settlement is not achieved, each party SHALL attach copies of their settlement offers to their
4
5
Confidential Settlement Conference Statement, as described below. Copies of these documents shall
6
not be filed on the court docket.
CONFIDENTIAL SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE STATEMENT
7
At least five court days prior to the Settlement Conference, the parties shall submit, directly to
8
9
Judge Thurston's chambers by e-mail to JLTorders@caed.uscourts.gov, a Confidential Settlement
10
Conference Statement. The statement should not be filed with the Clerk of the Court nor served on
11
any other party, although the parties may file a Notice of Lodging of Settlement Conference
12
Statement. Each statement shall be clearly marked "confidential" with the date and time of the
13
Settlement Conference indicated prominently thereon.
14
The Confidential Settlement Conference Statement shall include the following:
15
A.
A brief statement of the facts of the case.
16
B.
A brief statement of the claims and defenses, i.e., statutory or other grounds upon which
17
the claims are founded; a forthright evaluation of the parties' likelihood of prevailing on
18
the claims and defenses; and a description of the major issues in dispute.
19
C.
A summary of the proceedings to date.
20
D.
An estimate of the cost and time to be expended for further discovery, pretrial and trial.
21
E.
The relief sought.
22
F.
The party's position on settlement, including present demands and offers and a history of
past settlement discussions, offers and demands.
23
24
XI.
Request for Bifurcation, Appointment of Special Master, or other
25
Techniques to Shorten Trial
26
Not applicable at this time.
27
28
XII.
Related Matters Pending
There are no pending related matters.
7
1
2
XIII. Compliance with Federal Procedure
All counsel are expected to familiarize themselves with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure
3
and the Local Rules of Practice of the Eastern District of California, and to keep abreast of any
4
amendments thereto. The Court must insist upon compliance with these Rules if it is to efficiently
5
handle its increasing case load and sanctions will be imposed for failure to follow the Rules as provided
6
in both the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and the Local Rules of Practice for the Eastern District of
7
California.
8
XIV. Effect of this Order
9
The foregoing order represents the best estimate of the court and counsel as to the agenda most
10
suitable to dispose of this case. The trial date reserved is specifically reserved for this case. If the
11
parties determine at any time that the schedule outlined in this order cannot be met, counsel are ordered
12
to notify the court immediately of that fact so that adjustments may be made, either by stipulation or by
13
subsequent status conference.
14
The dates set in this Order are considered to be firm and will not be modified absent a
15
showing of good cause even if the request to modify is made by stipulation. Stipulations
16
extending the deadlines contained herein will not be considered unless they are accompanied by
17
affidavits or declarations, and where appropriate attached exhibits, which establish good cause
18
for granting the relief requested.
19
Failure to comply with this order may result in the imposition of sanctions.
20
21
22
23
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
February 17, 2016
/s/ Jennifer L. Thurston
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
24
25
26
27
28
8
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?