Enriquez v. University of Phoenix et al

Filing 37

ORDER Dismissing Defendant, University of Phoenix re 34 signed by District Judge Dale A. Drozd on 2/23/2016. (Lundstrom, T)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

ARIANA ENRIQUEZ,

12

Plaintiff,

13
14

No. 1:15-cv-01131-DAD-JLT

v.

ORDER DISMISSING DEFENDANT
UNIVERSITY OF PHOENIX

UNIVERSITY OF PHOENIX, et al.,
(Doc. No. 34)

15

Defendant.

16
On February 22, 2016, plaintiff filed a notice of voluntary dismissal only as to defendant

17
18

University of Phoenix, d/b/a Apollo Group, Inc., pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure

19

41(a)(1)(A)(i). (Doc. No. 34.) Defendant University of Phoenix has not filed a responsive

20

pleading in this action. In light of this, defendant University of Phoenix is DISMISSED from the

21

action. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(i); Pedrina v. Chun, 987 F.2d 608, 609 (9th Cir. 1993)

22

(“Rule 41(a)(1) allows a plaintiff to dismiss without a court order any defendant who has yet to

23

serve an answer or a motion for summary judgment.”). This order does not affect the status of

24

any other remaining defendant in this action.

25

IT IS SO ORDERED.

26

Dated:

February 23, 2016
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

27
28
1