Enriquez v. University of Phoenix et al

Filing 42

ORDER on DISMISSAL of Defendant Target National Bank signed by District Judge Dale A. Drozd on 4/12/2016. (Sant Agata, S)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

ARIANA ENRIQUEZ,

12

Plaintiff,

13
14

No. 1:15-cv-01131-DAD-JLT

v.

ORDER ON DISMISSAL OF DEFENDANT
TARGET NATIONAL BANK

TARGET NATIONAL BANK, et al.,
(Doc. No. 41)

15

Defendants.

16
On April 11, 2016, plaintiff filed a notice of voluntary dismissal against only defendant

17
18

Target National Bank pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(i). (Doc. No. 41.)

19

Defendant Target National Bank has not filed a responsive pleading. In light of this, defendant

20

Target National Bank has been terminated and dismissed from the action, see Fed. R. Civ. P.

21

41(a)(1)(A)(i); Pedrina v. Chun, 987 F.2d 608, 609 (9th Cir. 1993) (“Rule 41(a)(1) allows a

22

plaintiff to dismiss without a court order any defendant who has yet to serve an answer or a

23

motion for summary judgment.”). This order does not affect the status of any other defendant in

24

the matter.

25

IT IS SO ORDERED.

26

Dated:

April 12, 2016
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

27
28
1