The Sherwin-Williams Company v. Courtesy Oldsmobile-Cadillac, Inc., et al.
Filing
23
Stipulation and Order To Extend Time To Amend Answer and File Motion To Strike. The Initial Scheduling Conference set for October 22, 2015 at 10:00 AM is CONTINUED to January 14, 2016 at 11:30 AM in Yosemite (MJS) before Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng., signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng on 10/21/2015. (Yu, L)
1
2
3
4
5
Matthew W. Quall, #183759
mquall@quallcardot.com
Quall Cardot LLP
205 East River Park Circle, Suite 110
Fresno, CA 93720
Telephone: (559) 418-0333
Facsimile: (559) 418-0330
Attorneys for Defendants COURTESY OLDSMOBILE-CADILLAC, INC., a California
corporation, and BEN WELLS, an individual
6
7
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
12
THE SHERWIN-WILLIAMS COMPANY,
d/b/a SHERWIN-WILLIAMS AUTOMOTIVE
FINISHES,
Plaintiff,
13
16
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO
EXTEND TIME TO AMEND ANSWER
AND FILE MOTION TO STRIKE
v.
14
15
Case No. 1:15-cv-01137-MJS
COURTESY OLDSMOBILE-CADILLAC,
INC., a California corporation; and BEN WELLS,
an individual.
Defendant.
17
18
19
TO THE HONORABLE MICHAEL J. SENG, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE:
20
Defendants COURTESY OLDSMOBILE-CADILLAC, INC. and BEN WELLS
21
(collectively, “Defendants”), and Plaintiff, THE SHERWIN-WILLIAMS COMPANY, d/b/a
22
SHERWIN-WILLIAMS AUTOMOTIVE FINISHES (“Plaintiff”), by and through their
23
respective counsel, hereby agree and stipulate as follows:
RECITALS
24
25
WHEREAS, Plaintiff filed a Complaint for Damages and Demand for Jury Trial (the
26
“Complaint”) on July 22, 2015, in United Stated District Court, Eastern District of California,
27
Case No. 1:15-cv-01137.
28
///
1
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO AMEND ANSWER AND FILE MOTION TO STRIKE
1
WHEREAS, Defendants filed an Answer to the Complaint on October 5, 2015.
2
WHEREAS, Any Motion to Strike by Plaintiff must be filed on or before October 26,
3
2015.
4
WHEREAS, Defendants intend to voluntarily amend their Answer.
5
WHEREAS, Plaintiff and Defendants have agreed to extend the time for Defendants to
6
voluntarily amend their Answer to on or before November 9, 2015.
7
WHEREAS, in the event Defendants do not voluntarily amend their Answer, Plaintiff and
8
Defendants have agreed to extend the time for Plaintiff to file a Motion to Strike to on or before
9
November 23, 2015.
STIPULATION
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between Plaintiff and Defendants
as follows:
1.
The time for Defendants to file an Amended Answer shall be extended to on or
before November 9, 2015.
2.
Should Defendants not file an Amended Answer, the time for Plaintiff to file a
Motion to Strike shall be extended to November 23, 2015.
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
18
19
Dated: October 19, 2015
By: ___/s/ Matthew W. Quall_________
Matthew W. Quall
Attorneys for Defendants
COURTESY OLDSMOBILE-CADILLAC,
INC., a California corporation,
and BEN WELLS, an individual
Dated: October 19, 2015
By: ___/s/ George Fish
_____________
George Fish
Attorneys for Plaintiff THE SHERWINWILLIAMS COMPANY, d/b/a
SHERWIN-WILLIAMS AUTOMOTIVE
FINISHES
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO AMEND ANSWER AND FILE MOTION TO STRIKE
ORDER
1
2
GOOD CAUSE APPEARING, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED:
3
1.
4
5
6
7
The time for Defendants to file an Amended Answer shall be extended to on or
before November 9, 2015.
2.
Should Defendants not file an Amended Answer, the time for Plaintiff to file a
Motion to Strike shall be extended to November 23, 2015.
3.
Inasmuch as the pleadings are not yet at issue and issues of consent to Magistrate
8
Judge jurisdiction have been addressed and resolved, the Initial Scheduling Conference set for
9
October 22, 2015 at 10:00 AM shall be, and hereby is, CONTINUED to January 14, 2016 at 11:30
10
11
AM before Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
12
13
Dated:
October 21, 2015
/s/
Michael J. Seng
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO AMEND ANSWER AND FILE MOTION TO STRIKE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?