The Sherwin-Williams Company v. Courtesy Oldsmobile-Cadillac, Inc., et al.

Filing 52

Stipulation and Order To File Third Amended Answer, signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng on 08/29/2016. (Yu, L)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 Matthew W. Quall, #183759 mquall@quallcardot.com Quall Cardot LLP 205 East River Park Circle, Suite 110 Fresno, CA 93720 Telephone: (559) 418-0333 Facsimile: (559) 418-0330 Attorneys for Defendants COURTESY OLDSMOBILE-CADILLAC, INC., a California corporation, and BEN WELLS, an individual 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 12 THE SHERWIN-WILLIAMS COMPANY, d/b/a SHERWIN-WILLIAMS AUTOMOTIVE FINISHES, v. 14 16 STIPULATION AND ORDER TO FILE THIRD AMENDED ANSWER Plaintiff, 13 15 Case No. 1:15-cv-01137-MJS COURTESY OLDSMOBILE-CADILLAC, INC., a California corporation; and BEN WELLS, an individual. Defendant. 17 18 19 TO THE HONORABLE MICHAEL J. SENG, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE: 20 Defendants COURTESY OLDSMOBILE-CADILLAC, INC. and BEN WELLS 21 (collectively, “Defendants”), and Plaintiff, THE SHERWIN-WILLIAMS COMPANY, d/b/a 22 SHERWIN-WILLIAMS AUTOMOTIVE FINISHES (“Plaintiff”), by and through their 23 respective counsel, hereby agree and stipulate as follows: 24 RECITALS 25 WHEREAS, Plaintiff filed a Complaint for Damages and Demand for Jury Trial (the 26 “Complaint”) on July 22, 2015, in United Stated District Court, Eastern District of California, 27 Case No. 1:15-cv-01137. 28 /// 1 STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR DEFENDANTS TO FILE A THIRD AMENDED ANSWER 1 WHEREAS, Defendants filed an Answer with the Complaint on October 5, 2015. 2 WHEREAS, Defendants filed a Second Amended Answer with the Court on March 4, 3 4 2016. WHEREAS, Defendants intend to voluntarily amend their Answer. STIPULATION 5 6 7 IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between Plaintiff and Defendants as follows: 8 1. Defendants shall file a Third Amended Answer on or before September 2, 2016. 9 IT IS SO STIPULATED. 10 11 Dated: August 26, 2016 By: ___/s/ Matthew W. Quall Matthew W. Quall Attorneys for Defendants COURTESY OLDSMOBILE-CADILLAC, INC., a California corporation, and BEN WELLS, an individual Dated: August 26, 2016 By: ___/s/ Natasha M. Lockhart George Fish Jeffrey Wilson Natasha M. Lockhart Attorneys for Plaintiff THE SHERWINWILLIAMS COMPANY, d/b/a SHERWIN-WILLIAMS AUTOMOTIVE FINISHES 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 ORDER 21 22 23 GOOD CAUSE APPEARING, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendants may file a Third Amended Answer provided they do so before September 2, 2016. 24 25 26 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: August 29, 2016 /s/ 27 Michael J. Seng UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 28 2 STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR DEFENDANTS TO FILE A THIRD AMENDED ANSWER 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3 STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR DEFENDANTS TO FILE A THIRD AMENDED ANSWER

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?