Ricks v. Austria et al

Filing 55

ORDER STRIKING Plaintiff's Second Opposition to Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment and Demand for trial, signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 03/9/2018. (Martin-Gill, S)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 SCOTT K. RICKS, 7 8 9 Plaintiff, v. A. AUSTRIA, 10 Defendant. 11 12 13 14 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No.: 1:15-cv-01147-AWI-BAM (PC) ORDER STRIKING PLAINTIFF’S SECOND OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, AND DEMAND FOR TRIAL [ECF No. 54] Plaintiff Scott K. Ricks is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On October 30, 2017, Defendant Austria filed a motion for summary judgment. (ECF No. 15 43.) On November 27, 2017, Plaintiff filed an opposition to the motion. (ECF No. 46.) On 16 January 18, 2018, Defendant filed a reply to the opposition. (ECF No. 51.) 17 Currently before the Court is Plaintiff’s second opposition to Defendant’s motion for 18 summary judgment, filed on February 26, 2018. (ECF No. 54). The Court construes this filing as 19 a surreply. 20 No further briefing on Defendant’s motion for summary judgment is permitted absent 21 leave of court. The Court did not grant Plaintiff leave to file a surreply, and the Court does not 22 desire any further briefing on the motion. 23 Accordingly, Plaintiff’s surreply is HEREBY STRICKEN from the record. 24 25 26 27 28 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: March 9, 2018 /s/ Barbara A. McAuliffe _ UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?