Oliver v. DoCanto, et al.

Filing 11

ORDER to SHOW CAUSE Why Action Should Not be Dismissed for Failure to Comply With a Court Order and For Failure to State a Cognizable Claim for Relief, signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 2/1/16. Show Cause Response Due Within Twenty Days. (Marrujo, C)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

KENNETH OLIVER,

12

Plaintiff,

13
14

v.
M. DOCANTO, et al.,

15

Defendants.

16

Case No. 1:15-cv-01173-DAD-SAB (PC)
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY ACTION
SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR FAILURE
TO COMPLY WITH A COURT ORDER AND FOR
FAILURE TO STATE A COGNIZABLE CLAIM
FOR RELIEF
[ECF Nos. 1, 7]

Plaintiff Kenneth Oliver is appearing pro se in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. §

17
18

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

1983.

19

On November 19, 2015, the Court dismissed Plaintiff’s complaint for failure to state a claim

20

under section 1983 and ordered Plaintiff to file an amended complaint within thirty days. 28 U.S.C. §

21

1915A; 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e). Plaintiff was granted an additional thirty days to comply on December

22

17, 2015.
More than thirty days have since passed, and Plaintiff has not complied with or otherwise

23
24

responded to the Court’s order. As a result, there is no pleading on file which sets forth any claims

25

upon which relief may be granted. Within twenty (20) days from the date of service of this order,

26

Plaintiff is directed to show cause why this action should not be dismissed. Failure to comply with

27

///

28

///
1

1

this order will result in the action being dismissed, with prejudice, for failure to state a cognizable

2

claim for relief.

3
4

IT IS SO ORDERED.

5

Dated:

6

February 1, 2016
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14

15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2