Cavanaugh v. American National Property and Casualty Company et al

Filing 66

STIPULATION and ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 08/31/17 ORDERING that that the cut-off for depositions of expert witnesses is EXTENDED until 30 days after the Court rules on the dispositive motions filed in this matter. All other dates set forth in the Pretrial Scheduling Order remain unchanged. (Benson, A.)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 WILLIAM G. CAVANAUGH, et al., No. 1:15-cv-01177-TLN-SKO Plaintiffs, 12 v. 13 14 AMERICAN NATIONAL PROPERTY AND CASUALTY COMPANY, et al., ORDER Defendants. 15 16 17 AMERICAN NATIONAL PROPERTY AND CASUALTY COMPANY, Third-Party Plaintiff, 18 v. 19 WILLIAM G. CAVANAUGH, et al., 20 Third-Party Defendants. 21 22 23 The parties acknowledge that the Pretrial Scheduling Order “instructed the parties to 24 complete all discovery of expert witnesses in a timely manner in order to comply with the Court’s 25 deadline for the filing of dispositive motions.” (ECF No. 65 at 2.) The parties acknowledge that 26 the Pretrial Scheduling Order requires that “all such motions be heard no later than August 24, 27 2017.” (ECF No. 65 at 2.) The parties have filed a joint stipulation requesting that “the cut-off 28 for depositions of expert witnesses [be] extended until thirty days after the Court rules on the 1 1 dispositive motions filed in this matter.” (ECF No. 65 at 3.) This request is GRANTED.1 All 2 other dates set forth in the Pretrial Scheduling Order remain unchanged. 3 4 Dated: August 31, 2017 5 6 7 Troy L. Nunley United States District Judge 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1 The Court observes that the instant request was filed on August 28, 2017, after the deadline the parties seek to extend had already passed. See L.R. 230(b). The parties are admonished that a request for an extension of a deadline should be made before that deadline passes. 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?