Cavanaugh v. American National Property and Casualty Company et al
Filing
66
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 08/31/17 ORDERING that that the cut-off for depositions of expert witnesses is EXTENDED until 30 days after the Court rules on the dispositive motions filed in this matter. All other dates set forth in the Pretrial Scheduling Order remain unchanged. (Benson, A.)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
WILLIAM G. CAVANAUGH, et al.,
No. 1:15-cv-01177-TLN-SKO
Plaintiffs,
12
v.
13
14
AMERICAN NATIONAL PROPERTY
AND CASUALTY COMPANY, et al.,
ORDER
Defendants.
15
16
17
AMERICAN NATIONAL PROPERTY
AND CASUALTY COMPANY,
Third-Party Plaintiff,
18
v.
19
WILLIAM G. CAVANAUGH, et al.,
20
Third-Party Defendants.
21
22
23
The parties acknowledge that the Pretrial Scheduling Order “instructed the parties to
24
complete all discovery of expert witnesses in a timely manner in order to comply with the Court’s
25
deadline for the filing of dispositive motions.” (ECF No. 65 at 2.) The parties acknowledge that
26
the Pretrial Scheduling Order requires that “all such motions be heard no later than August 24,
27
2017.” (ECF No. 65 at 2.) The parties have filed a joint stipulation requesting that “the cut-off
28
for depositions of expert witnesses [be] extended until thirty days after the Court rules on the
1
1
dispositive motions filed in this matter.” (ECF No. 65 at 3.) This request is GRANTED.1 All
2
other dates set forth in the Pretrial Scheduling Order remain unchanged.
3
4
Dated: August 31, 2017
5
6
7
Troy L. Nunley
United States District Judge
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
1
The Court observes that the instant request was filed on August 28, 2017, after the deadline the parties seek
to extend had already passed. See L.R. 230(b). The parties are admonished that a request for an extension of a
deadline should be made before that deadline passes.
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?