Ramirez v. Commissioner of Social Security
Filing
4
SECOND ORDER DIRECTING PLAINTIFF to Pay the Filing Fee or File a Motion to Proceed in Forma Pauperis, signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 8/20/2015. (Hall, S)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
12
13
14
15
VINCENT YSARRARAS RAMIREZ, SR.,
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
v.
)
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, )
)
)
Defendant.
)
Case No.: 1:15-cv-01187 - JLT
SECOND ORDER DIRECTING PLAINTIFF TO
PAY THE FILING FEE OR FILE A MOTION TO
PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS
16
17
Vincent Ysarraras Ramirez, Sr., seeks to proceed with an action against the Commissioner of
18
Social Security. As a general rule, all parties instituting any civil action, suit or proceeding in a United
19
States District Court must pay a filing fee. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a). However, the Court may authorize the
20
commencement of an action without the filing fee “by a person who submits an affidavit that includes a
21
statement of all assets such [person] possesses that the person is unable to pay such fees or give
22
security therefore.” 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(1). Therefore, an action may proceed despite a failure to
23
prepay the filing fee only if leave to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”) is granted by the Court. See
24
Rodriguez v. Cook, 169 F.3d 1176, 1177 (9th Cir. 1999).
25
Plaintiff commenced this action by filing a complaint on July 30, 2015. (Doc. 1) However,
26
Plaintiff failed to pay the requisite filing fee or to file a motion to proceed IFP. Therefore, on August
27
4, 2015, the Court ordered Plantiff to either pay the filing fee or file a a motion to proceed IFP. (Doc.
28
2) On August 12, 2015, Plaintiff filed a response to the Court’s order, saying he “received a denial of
1
1
2
informa pauperis [but] the document was stolen...” (Doc. 3 at 1)
However, the Court has not received a request from Plaintiff to proceed IFP in this action, and
3
as such, the Court has not determined whether Plaintiff saitsifies the requirements of 28 U.S.C. §
4
1951(a)(1). Accordingly, the Court will grant Plaintiff an extension of time to either pay the filing fee
5
or file a motion to proceed IFP in this matter.
6
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED:
7
1.
Plaintiff SHALL pay the filing fee within 21 days of service of this order, or
8
2.
In the alternative, Plaintiff SHALL file a motion to proceed in forma pauperis within
21 days of service.
9
10
3.
Failure to comply with this order will result in a recommendation that the action
be dismissed pursuant to Local Rule 110.
11
12
13
14
15
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
August 20, 2015
/s/ Jennifer L. Thurston
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?