Gonzalez v. The Fresno Sheriff's Department et al

Filing 66

ORDER DENYING Without Prejudice Parties' Motions Regarding Discovery 57 , 61 , 62 , 63 , 64 ; ORDER Referring Case to Post-Screening ADR and STAYING CASE for 120 Days, signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 3/5/2018. (Hellings, J)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 MICHAEL HERNANDEZ GONZALEZ, 12 13 14 15 16 17 Plaintiff, v. FRESNO SHERIFF’S DEPARTMENT, et al., Case No. 1:15-cv-01200-BAM (PC) ORDER DENYING WITHOUT PREJUDICE PARTIES’ MOTIONS REGARDING DISCOVERY (ECF Nos. 57, 61, 62, 63, 64) ORDER REFERRING CASE TO POSTSCREENING ADR AND STAYING CASE FOR 120 DAYS Defendants. Plaintiff Michael Hernandez Gonzalez (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner, proceeding pro se 18 and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. All defendants 19 have answered the complaint. (ECF Nos. 28, 65.) This action proceeds against Defendants 20 Mims, Gutierrez, Palacios, and Nemoto for allegedly failing to protect Plaintiff in violation of the 21 Fourteenth Amendment. 22 Currently before the Court are a series of motions filed by the parties relating to discovery 23 and amendment of the Court’s discovery and scheduling order. (ECF Nos. 57, 61, 62, 63, 64.) 24 As discussed below, the Court has identified this case as appropriate for post-screening ADR 25 (Alternative Dispute Resolution), which is an effort to resolve such cases more expeditiously and 26 less expensively. As all formal discovery will be stayed pending the filing of defense counsel’s 27 written notice to opt out or the outcome of the settlement conference, these motions will be 28 denied without prejudice to refiling. 1 No claims, defenses, or objections shall be waived by the parties’ participation in the 1 2 settlement conference. In appropriate cases, defense counsel from the California State Attorney 3 General’s Office has agreed to participate in these early settlements. 4 As set forth in the screening order, Plaintiff has stated a cognizable civil rights claim. But, 5 stating a cognizable claim does not mean Plaintiff will prevail at trial. Thus, the Court stays this 6 action for a period of 120 days to allow the parties to investigate Plaintiff’s claims, meet and 7 confer, and then participate in a settlement conference. 8 9 10 Therefore, this case will be referred to Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone to conduct a settlement conference at United States Courthouse in Fresno, California on June 19, 2018, at 10:00 a.m. The Court will issue any necessary transportation order in due course.1 11 In issuing this order, there is a presumption that this case will proceed to a settlement 12 conference.2 However, if after investigating Plaintiff’s claims and speaking with Plaintiff, and 13 after conferring with others, defense counsel in good faith finds that a settlement conference 14 would be a waste of resources, defense counsel may move to opt out of this early settlement 15 conference. A written notice to opt out must be filed within thirty (30) days of the date of the 16 issuance of this order. 17 The parties shall each submit to Judge Boone a confidential settlement conference 18 statement, as described below, to arrive at least seven days (one week) prior to the conference. 19 The Court puts the parties on notice that if Plaintiff has any outstanding criminal 20 restitution obligation, fines and/or penalties, these settlement negotiations shall not be geared 21 towards what the restitution obligation is, but what the value the of the case itself is to each side, 22 irrespective of any outstanding restitution obligation. 23 In accordance with the above, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 24 1. The parties’ pending discovery motions (ECF Nos. 57, 61, 62, 63, 64) are DENIED, 25 26 27 without prejudice; 1 Plaintiff has stated that his anticipated release date is April 25, 2018. (ECF No. 64.) In the event Plaintiff is released prior to the settlement conference, no transportation order will be issued. 2 28 If the case does not settle, the Court will then lift the stay of its Discovery and Scheduling Order or issue an Amended Discovery and Scheduling Order forthwith. 2 1 2. This action is STAYED for 120 days to allow the parties an opportunity to settle their 2 dispute before the discovery process continues. Except as provided herein or by 3 subsequent court order, no other pleadings or other documents may be filed in this 4 case during the stay of this action. The parties shall not engage in formal discovery, 5 but may engage in informal discovery to prepare for the settlement conference. 6 3. This case is set for a settlement conference before Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone 7 on June 19, 2018, at 10:00 a.m., at the United States Courthouse located at 2500 8 Tulare Street, Fresno, California. 9 4. A representative with full and unlimited authority to negotiate and enter into a binding 10 settlement shall attend in person. 11 5. Those in attendance must be prepared to discuss the claims, defenses and damages. 12 The failure of any counsel, party or authorized person subject to this order to appear in 13 person may result in the imposition of sanctions. In addition, the conference will not 14 proceed and may be reset to another date. 15 6. Defendants shall provide a confidential settlement statement to the following email 16 address: saborders@caed.uscourts.gov. Plaintiff shall mail his confidential 17 settlement statement to U.S. District Court, 2500 Tulare Street, Fresno, California, 18 93721, “Attention: Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone.” The envelope shall be 19 marked “Confidential Settlement Statement”. Settlement statements shall arrive no 20 later than June 12, 2017. Parties shall also file a Notice of Submission of 21 Confidential Settlement Statement. See Local Rule 270(d). Settlement statements 22 should not be filed with the Clerk of the Court nor served on any other party. 23 Settlement statements shall be clearly marked “confidential” with the date and time of 24 the settlement conference indicated prominently thereon. 25 7. The confidential settlement statement shall be no longer than five pages in length, 26 typed or neatly printed, and include the following: 27 28 a. A brief statement of the facts of the case. /// 3 1 b. A brief statement of the claims and defenses, i.e., statutory or other grounds 2 upon which the claims are founded; a forthright evaluation of the parties’ 3 likelihood of prevailing on the claims and defenses; and a description of the 4 major issues in dispute. 5 c. An estimate of the cost and time to be expended for further discovery, pretrial, 6 and trial. 7 d. The party’s position on settlement, including present demands and offers and a 8 history of past settlement discussions, offers, and demands. 9 e. A brief statement of each party’s expectations and goals for the settlement 10 conference, including how much a party is willing to accept and/or willing to 11 pay. 12 8. If a settlement is reached at any point during the stay of this action, the parties shall 13 14 file a Notice of Settlement in accordance with Local Rule 160. 9. If the defense counsel wishes to “opt-out” of this settlement for the reasons stated 15 above, counsel must do so within thirty (30) days of this order by filing a “Notice of 16 Opt-Out and Request to Vacate Settlement Conference.” 17 10. The parties remain obligated to keep the Court informed of their current address at all 18 times during the stay and while the action is pending. Any change of address must be 19 reported promptly to the Court in a separate document captioned for this case and 20 entitled “Notice of Change of Address.” See Local Rule 182(f). 21 11. A failure to follow these procedures may result in the imposition of sanctions by the 22 court. 23 24 25 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: /s/ Barbara March 5, 2018 A. McAuliffe _ UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 26 27 28 4

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?