Walker et al v. Performance Contracting, Inc. et al

Filing 10

ORDER GRANTING 6 Stipulation for Extension of Time to File Responsive Pleading, signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 9/9/2016. (Hall, S)

1
2
3
4
5
6

Douglas A. Pettit, Esq., SBN 160371
Christine M. Mueller, Esq., SBN 231198
PETTIT KOHN INGRASSIA & LUTZ PC
11622 El Camino Real, Suite 300
San Diego, CA 92130
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
E-mail: [e-mail]
[e-mail]
Attorneys for Defendant
PERFORMANCE CONTRACTING, INC.

7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

GERALD WALKER, RAY
STEWARD; FOSTER BROWN,
individuals,

CASE NO.: 1:15-CV-01206-JLT
STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR
EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE
RESPONSIVE PLEADING (L.R. 144;
FRCP 6)

Plaintiffs,

12
13

v.

14

PERFORMANCE
CONTRACTING, INC.; VANCE
MANNING; DOES 1 through 100,

15

Defendants.

16
17
18

(Doc. 6)

Pursuant to Local Rule 144 and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure Rule 6,
Plaintiffs Gerald Walker, Ray Steward, and Foster Brown (collectively,

19

“Plaintiffs”), through their attorney of record, and Defendant Performance

20

Contracting, Inc. (“Defendant”), through its attorney of record, hereby stipulate to

21

an extension of time for Defendant to file its responsive pleading.

22

WHEREAS:

23
24

1.

Plaintiffs filed a Complaint in the above-captioned matter on August 3,

2.

Defendant was served with the subject Complaint on August 14, 2015.

3.

Defendant’s responsive pleading is currently due September 4, 2015.

4.

Vance Manning has not yet been served with the Complaint.

2015.

25
26
27
28
1605-2005

1

STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF T

5.

1

Defendant is currently ascertaining whether its counsel will be

2

representing Mr. Manning in this action. The parties agree that Defendant may

3

have an additional 28 days to file a responsive pleading so that it may make such a

4

determination.
Based on the foregoing, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between all

5
6

parties through their respective counsel of record that:
(1) Defendant Performance Contracting, Inc.’s date to respond to the

7

Complaint is extended to October 2, 2015.

8
9

IT IS SO STIPULATED

10

LAW OFFICE OF RANDY RUMPH

11
12

Dated: September 4, 2015____ By:

13
14
15

/s/ Randall Martin Rumph, Esq. (As
authorized on September 4, 2015)
Randall Martin Rumph, Esq.
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
GERALD WALKER; RAY STEWARD;
FOSTER BROWN
Email: [e-mail]

16

PETTIT KOHN INGRASSIA & LUTZ PC

17
18
19

Dated: September 4, 2015

20
21
22
23
24

By:

/s/ Christine M. Mueller, Esq.
Douglas A. Pettit, Esq.
Christine M. Mueller, Esq.
Attorneys for Defendant
PERFORMANCE CONTRACTING,
INC.
Email: [e-mail]
[e-mail]

IT IS SO ORDERED.

25

Dated:

September 9, 2015

/s/ Jennifer L. Thurston
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

26
27
28
1605-2005

2

STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF T