Duarte v. Enemoh et al

Filing 15

ORDER Regarding Plaintiff's Notice Of Payment Of Filing Fee (Document 14 ), ORDER Directing Clerk Of Court To Serve Order On CSATF Trust Account Office, signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis L. Beck on 1/26/2016. (Fahrney, E)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

PATRICK F. DUARTE,

12

Plaintiff,

13
14

v.
ENEMOH, et al.,

15

Defendants.

Case No. 1:15-cv-01213-DAD-DLB PC
ORDER REGARDING PLAINTIFF’S
NOTICE OF PAYMENT OF FILING FEE
(Document 14)
ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT TO
SERVE ORDER ON CSATF TRUST
ACCOUNT OFFICE

16
17

Plaintiff Patrick F. Duarte (“Plaintiff”) is a California state prisoner proceeding pro se in this

18

civil action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff’s December 23, 2015, First Amended Complaint

19

is awaiting screening.

20

Plaintiff filed this action and was granted in forma pauperis status.

21

On January 21, 2016, Plaintiff filed a letter with the Court indicating that on December 14,

22

2015, an individual paid the remainder of the filing fee on his behalf. He states that since that date,

23

CSATF has transferred $74.47 to the Court, resulting in an overpayment. Plaintiff asks that this

24

amount be refunded, and that CSATF be notified that the filing fee has been paid in full.
The Court has confirmed that the filing fee has been paid in full. Therefore, any deduction

25
26

for a filing fee in this action after December 14, 2015, is erroneous. To the extent that Plaintiff’s

27

///

28

///
1

1

trust account has been deducted for a filing fee in this action after the amount was paid in full, the

2

trust account office is directed to return said funds and remove any filing fee attached to this case.1

3
4

The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to serve a copy of this order on the prison trust account
office at CSATF.

5
6

IT IS SO ORDERED.

7

Dated:

/s/ Dennis

January 26, 2016

L. Beck

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
1

Records indicate an overpayment in the amount of $60.35.

2