Hilson v. Arnett et al
Filing
53
ORDER Adopting 52 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS and DENYING Plaintiff's Motion for Law Library Access signed by District Judge Dale A. Drozd on 11/28/2017. (Sant Agata, S)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
RASHEED HILSON, SR.
12
Plaintiff,
13
v.
14
No. 1:15-cv-01240-DAD-MJS
ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND
RECOMMENDATIONS AND DENYING
PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR LAW
LIBRARY ACCESS
JESSE ARNETT,
(Doc. Nos. 51, 52.)
15
Defendant.
16
17
Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights
18
action brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States
19
Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302 of this court.
20
On September 11, 2017, the assigned magistrate judge issued findings and
21
recommendations recommending that plaintiff’s motion for prison law library access, construed
22
as a motion for injunctive relief, be denied. (Doc. No. 52.) In the findings and recommendations
23
the magistrate judge concluded that the court lacks personal jurisdiction to issue such an
24
injunction. However, the magistrate judge also issued an order requesting assistance from the
25
prison’s litigation coordinator with respect to the issue of plaintiff’s access to the law library. The
26
findings and recommendation were served on all parties with notice that any objections thereto
27
were to be filed within fourteen days. No objections to the findings and recommendations have
28
been filed.
1
1
In accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), the court has conducted a de novo review of
2
this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the court finds the findings and
3
recommendation to be supported by the record and by proper analysis.
4
For these reasons:
5
1.
6
7
adopted in full; and
2.
8
9
10
The findings and recommendations filed on September 11, 2017 (Doc. No. 52) are
Plaintiff’s motion for law library access (Doc. No. 51), construed by the court as a
motion for injunctive relief, is denied.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
November 28, 2017
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?