Hilson v. Arnett et al

Filing 66

ORDER Directing Responses to Plaintiff's Discovery Motions 61 , 62 , 65 , signed by Magistrate Judge Jeremy D. Peterson on 5/18/2018: 21-Day Deadline. (Hellings, J)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 RASHEED HILSON, SR., 12 13 Plaintiff, Case No. 1:15-cv-01240-DAD-JDP (PC) ORDER DIRECTING RESPONSES TO PLAINTIFF’S DISCOVERY MOTIONS vs. (ECF Nos. 61, 62, 65) 14 JESSE ARNETT, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 Rasheed Hilson, Sr. (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma 18 pauperis with this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. ' 1983. On April 3, 2018, the Court 19 granted a request to extend the discovery deadline by ninety days. (ECF No. 63.) Since that 20 time, Plaintiff has filed three discovery-related motions. (ECF Nos. 61, 62, 65.) Defendants 21 have yet to file a response to these motions. 22 Accordingly, the Court orders that Defendants file a response to the pending motions 23 (ECF Nos. 61, 62, 65) within 21 days of this order. After review of the responses, the Court 24 will set a discovery dispute conference, if appropriate. 25 26 IT IS SO ORDERED. 27 28 Dated: May 18, 2018 /s/ Jeremy D. Peterson UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?