Denegal v. Farrell et al

Filing 71

ORDER re 70 Request for Authority to Incur Costs, signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 6/22/18. (Gonzalez, R)

Download PDF
Print Form Case 1:15-cv-01251-DAD-JLT Document 70 Filed 06/21/18 Page 1 of 2 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Fatima Shabazz a/k/a Dwayne Denegal Plaintiff(s) vs. R. Farrell, et al. Defendants. No. 1:15-cv-01251-DAD-JLT (PC) REQUEST FOR AUTHORITY TO INCUR COSTS (APPOINTED COUNSEL) AND REQUEST FOR PAYMENT ______________________/ REQUEST OF PRO BONO FOR PRE-APPROVAL OF EXPENDITURES Complete this form and return it to the court (with two copies) for approval prior to incurring the cost for which reimbursement is requested. I, Carter C. White , attorney for plaintiff(s), declare as follows: I was appointed to represent plaintiff(s) in this action on December 26, 2017 , by the Honorable Michael J. Seng , United States District Judge/Magistrate Judge. I believe that the following course of action is reasonably necessary to the prosecution of this action: retaining expert witness Randi Ettner, Ph.D. (see attached declaration in support) Counsel seeking reimbursement must support all claimed expenses by submitting invoices, receipts or similar documentation. Without such documentation, counsel will not be reimbursed. I have made reasonable inquiry and believe that the cost of this course of action will not exceed the amount of $ 10,000 . I therefore request that this court authorize the expenditure in an amount not to exceed that stated above for the completion of this contemplated course of action. Case 1:15-cv-01251-DAD-JLT Document 70 Filed 06/21/18 Page 2 of 2 REQUEST OF PRO BONO FOR PRE-APPROVAL OF EXPENDITURES - PAGE 2 Case Number: 1:15-cv-01251-DAD-JLT (PC) The following payments of costs have been heretofore approved in this matter: Amount Approved Amount Paid Purpose I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Signed this 21st day of June , 20 18 , at Contra Costa County , California. /S/ Carter C. White Attorney for Plaintiff(s) The above expenditure is X* Approved Denied Or, Good cause appearing therefore, this matter is set for discovery conference, pursuant to rule _______, on _______________________, at ___________, ___.M. in Courtroom Number_______. Dated: June 22, 2018 United States District Judge/Magistrate Judge *The Court anticipates that this amount will be more than enough for the entirety of the case, including trial. If, at any point, it appears that this is amount will not cover, counsel SHALL report to the Court and explain the situation.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?