Denegal v. Farrell et al
Filing
83
ORDER GRANTING 82 Extension of Time to File a Reply to the Response to the Motion to Dismiss, signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 1/16/2019. Reply due by 2/4/2019. (Hall, S)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
12
DWAYNE DENEGAL (FATIMA
SHABAZZ),
13
14
v.
Case No. 1:15-cv-01251 DAD JLT PC
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING
Plaintiff, EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE A
REPLY TO THE RESPONSE TO THE
MOTION TO DISMISS
15
(Doc. 82)
R. FARRELL, et al.,
16
Defendants.
17
18
19
Good cause having been shown, Defendants are granted a two-week extension of time, to
20
and including February 4, 2019, within which to file a reply to Plaintiff’s response to Defendants’
21
motion to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction.
22
23
24
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
January 16, 2019
/s/ Jennifer L. Thurston
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
25
26
27
28
1
[Proposed] Order (1:15-cv-01251 DAD MJS PC)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?