Denegal v. Farrell et al

Filing 83

ORDER GRANTING 82 Extension of Time to File a Reply to the Response to the Motion to Dismiss, signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 1/16/2019. Reply due by 2/4/2019. (Hall, S)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 12 DWAYNE DENEGAL (FATIMA SHABAZZ), 13 14 v. Case No. 1:15-cv-01251 DAD JLT PC [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING Plaintiff, EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE A REPLY TO THE RESPONSE TO THE MOTION TO DISMISS 15 (Doc. 82) R. FARRELL, et al., 16 Defendants. 17 18 19 Good cause having been shown, Defendants are granted a two-week extension of time, to 20 and including February 4, 2019, within which to file a reply to Plaintiff’s response to Defendants’ 21 motion to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. 22 23 24 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: January 16, 2019 /s/ Jennifer L. Thurston UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 25 26 27 28 1 [Proposed] Order (1:15-cv-01251 DAD MJS PC)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?