Bechtel v. Lebec County Water District et al

Filing 16

SCHEDULING ORDER, signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 1/22/2016. Pleading Amendment Deadline 6/24/2016. Discovery Deadlines: Initial Disclosures 3/18/2016; Non-Expert 12/16/2016; Expert 1/27/2017. Mid-Discovery Status Conference set for 6/27/2016 at 08:30 AM in Bakersfield at 510 19th Street (JLT) before Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston. Non-Dispositive Motion Deadlines: Filed by 3/3/2017; Hearing by 3/31/2017. Dispositive Motion Deadlines: Filed by 3/3/2017; Hearing by 4/14/2017. Settlement Conference set for 4/28/2017 at 10:30 AM in Courtroom 10 (EPG), Fresno, before Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean. Pretrial Conference set for 5/19/2017 at 08:30 AM in Bakersfield at 510 19th Street (JLT) before Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston. Jury Trial set for 7/11/2017 at 08:30 AM in Bakersfield at 510 19th Street (JLT) before Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston. (Hall, S)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11
12
13
14
15
16

DEBBIE BECHTEL,

)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
v.
)
LEBEC COUNTY WATER DISTRICT, et al., )
)
Defendants.
)
)

17

Case No.: 1:15-CV-01253- JLT
SCHEDULING ORDER (Fed. R. Civ. P. 16)
Pleading Amendment Deadline: 6/24/2016
Discovery Deadlines:
Initial Disclosures: 3/18/2016
Non-Expert: 12/16/2016
Expert: 1/27/2017
Mid-Discovery Status Conference:
6/27/2016 at 8:30 a.m.

18
Non-Dispositive Motion Deadlines:
Filing: 3/3/2017
Hearing: 3/31/2017

19
20
21

Dispositive Motion Deadlines:
Filing: 3/3/2017
Hearing: 4/14/2017

22
23

Settlement Conference:
4/28/2017 at 10:30 a.m. Courtroom 10

24
25

Pre-Trial Conference:
5/19/2017 at 8:30 a.m.
510 19th Street, Bakersfield, CA

26
27

Trial: 7/11/2017 at 8:30 a.m.
510 19th Street, Bakersfield, CA
Jury trial: 4-5 days

28
1

1

I.

January 21, 2016.

2
3

Date of Scheduling Conference

II.

Appearances of Counsel

4

Randall Rumph appeared on behalf of Plaintiff.

5

John Szewczyk appeared on behalf of Defendants.

6

III.

Pleading Amendment Deadline
Any requested pleading amendments are ordered to be filed, either through a stipulation or

7
8

motion to amend, no later than June 24, 2016.

9

IV.

The parties are ordered to exchange the initial disclosures required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(1)

10
11

on or before March 18, 2016.
The parties are ordered to complete all discovery pertaining to non-experts on or before

12
13

Discovery Plan and Cut-Off Date

December 16, 2016, and all discovery pertaining to experts on or before January 27, 2017.
The parties are directed to disclose all expert witnesses1, in writing, on or November 18, 2016,

14
15

and to disclose all rebuttal experts on or before December 6, 2016. The written designation of retained

16

and non-retained experts shall be made pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. Rule 26(a)(2), (A), (B), and (C)

17

and shall include all information required thereunder. Failure to designate experts in compliance

18

with this order may result in the Court excluding the testimony or other evidence offered through such

19

experts that are not disclosed pursuant to this order.

20

The written designation of retained and non-retained experts shall be made pursuant to Fed. R.

21

Civ. P. 26(a)(2), (A), (B), and (C) and shall include all information required thereunder. Failure to

22

designate experts in compliance with this order may result in the Court excluding the testimony or other

23

evidence offered through such experts that are not disclosed pursuant to this order.
The provisions of Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(b)(4) and (5) shall apply to all discovery relating to experts

24
25

and their opinions. Experts must be fully prepared to be examined on all subjects and opinions

26
27
1

28

In the event an expert will offer opinions related to an independent medical or mental health evaluation, the
examination SHALL occur sufficiently in advance of the disclosure deadline so the expert’s report fully details the
expert’s opinions in this regard.

2

1

included in the designation. Failure to comply will result in the imposition of sanctions, which may

2

include striking the expert designation and preclusion of expert testimony.
The provisions of Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(e) regarding a party’s duty to timely supplement

3
4

disclosures and responses to discovery requests will be strictly enforced.
A mid-discovery status conference is scheduled for June 27, 2016 at 8:30 a.m. before the

5
6

Honorable Jennifer L. Thurston, United States Magistrate Judge, at the United States District

7

Courthouse located at 510 19th Street, Bakersfield, California. A Joint Mid-Discovery Status

8

Conference Report, carefully prepared and executed by all counsel, shall be electronically filed in

9

CM/ECF, one (1) full week prior to the Conference and shall be e-mailed, in Word format to,

10

[e-mail]. Counsel may appear by telephone, provided a written request to so

11

appear is made to the Magistrate Judge's Courtroom Clerk no later than five (5) court days before the

12

noticed hearing date. In the event that more than one attorney requests to appear by telephone then it

13

shall be the obligation of the requesting part(ies) to arrange a Court Call conference.

14

V.

Pre-Trial Motion Schedule

15

All non-dispositive pre-trial motions, including any discovery motions, shall be filed no later

16

than March 3, 2017, and heard on or before March 31, 2017. Non-dispositive motions are heard at

17

9:00 a.m. at the United States District Courthouse in Bakersfield, California, before the Honorable

18

Jennifer L. Thurston, United States Magistrate Judge.

19

No written discovery motions shall be filed without the prior approval of the assigned

20

Magistrate Judge. A party with a discovery dispute must first confer with the opposing party in a good

21

faith effort to resolve by agreement the issues in dispute. If that good faith effort is unsuccessful, the

22

moving party promptly shall seek a telephonic hearing with all involved parties and the Magistrate

23

Judge. It shall be the obligation of the moving party to arrange and originate the conference call to the

24

court. To schedule this telephonic hearing, the parties are ordered to contact Courtroom Deputy Clerk,

25

Susan Hall at [phone] or via email at [e-mail]. Counsel must comply with

26

Local Rule 251 with respect to discovery disputes or the motion will be denied without prejudice

27

and dropped from calendar.

28

In scheduling such motions, the Magistrate Judge may grant applications for an order shortening
3

1

time pursuant to Local Rule 144(e). However, if counsel does not obtain an order shortening time, the

2

notice of motion must comply with Local Rule 251.
Counsel may appear and argue non-dispositive motions by telephone, provided a written request

3
4

to so appear is made to the Magistrate Judge's Courtroom Clerk no later than five (5) court days before

5

the noticed hearing date. In the event that more than one attorney requests to appear by telephone then

6

it shall be the obligation of the moving part(ies) to arrange and originate a conference call to the court.
All dispositive pre-trial motions shall be filed no later than March 3, 2017, and heard no later

7
8

than April 14, 2017, before the Honorable Jennifer L. Thurston, United States Magistrate Judge, at the

9

United States District Courthouse in Bakersfield, California. In scheduling such motions, counsel shall

10

comply with Fed. R. Civ. P. 56 and Local Rules 230 and 260.

11

VI.

Motions for Summary Judgment or Summary Adjudication

12

At least 21 days before filing a motion for summary judgment or motion for summary

13

adjudication, the parties are ORDERED to meet, in person or by telephone, to confer about the issues

14

to be raised in the motion.

15

The purpose of the meeting shall be to: 1) avoid filing motions for summary judgment where a

16

question of fact exists; 2) determine whether the respondent agrees that the motion has merit in whole

17

or in part; 3) discuss whether issues can be resolved without the necessity of briefing; 4) narrow the

18

issues for review by the court; 5) explore the possibility of settlement before the parties incur the

19

expense of briefing a summary judgment motion; and, 6) to develop a joint statement of undisputed

20

facts.

21

The moving party SHALL initiate the meeting and SHALL provide a complete, proposed

22

statement of undisputed facts at least five days before the conference. The finalized joint statement of

23

undisputed facts SHALL include all facts that the parties agree, for purposes of the motion, may be

24

deemed true. In addition to the requirements of Local Rule 260, the moving party shall file the joint

25

statement of undisputed facts.

26

In the notice of motion the moving party SHALL certify that the parties have met and conferred

27

as ordered above, or set forth a statement of good cause for the failure to meet and confer. Failure to

28

comply may result in the motion being stricken.
4

1

VII.

May 19, 2017, at 8:30 a.m. at the United States District Courthouse in Bakersfield, California

2
3

Pre-Trial Conference Date

before the Honorable Jennifer L. Thurston, United States Magistrate Judge.
The parties are ordered to file a Joint Pretrial Statement pursuant to Local Rule 281(a)(2).

4
5

The parties are further directed to submit a digital copy of their pretrial statement in Word format,

6

directly to Judge Thurston’s chambers, by email at [e-mail].
Counsels' attention is directed to Rules 281 and 282 of the Local Rules of Practice for the

7
8

Eastern District of California, as to the obligations of counsel in preparing for the pre-trial conference.

9

The Court will insist upon strict compliance with those rules. In addition to the matters set forth in the

10

Local Rules the Joint Pretrial Statement shall include a Joint Statement of the case to be used by the

11

Court to explain the nature of the case to the jury during voir dire.

12

VIII. Trial Date
July 11, 2017, at 8:30 a.m. at the United States District Courthouse in Bakersfield, California,

13
14

before the Honorable Jennifer L. Thurston, United States Magistrate Judge.

15

A.

This is a jury trial.

16

B.

Counsels' Estimate of Trial Time: 4-5 days.

17

C.

Counsels' attention is directed to Local Rules of Practice for the Eastern District of

18

California, Rule 285.

19

IX.

20

Settlement Conference
A Settlement Conference is scheduled for April 28, 2017 at 10:30 a.m. in Courtroom 10, at the

21

Robert E. Coyle Federal Courthouse in Fresno, California. The settlement conference will be

22

conducted by Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean.

23

Unless otherwise permitted in advance by the Court, the attorneys who will try the case shall

24

appear at the Settlement Conference with the parties and the person or persons having full authority

25

to negotiate and settle the case on any terms2 at the conference. Consideration of settlement is a

26
27
28

2

Insurance carriers, business organizations, and governmental bodies or agencies whose settlement agreements
are subject to approval by legislative bodies, executive committees, boards of directors or the like shall be represented by a
person or persons who occupy high executive positions in the party organization and who will be directly involved in the
process of approval of any settlement offers or agreements. To the extent possible the representative shall have the

5

1

serious matter that requires preparation prior to the settlement conference. Set forth below are the

2

procedures the Court will employ, absent good cause, in conducting the conference.

3

At least twenty-one days before the settlement conference, Plaintiff SHALL submit to

4

Defendant via fax or e-mail, a written itemization of damages and a meaningful3 settlement demand

5

which includes a brief explanation of why such a settlement is appropriate. Thereafter, no later than

6

fourteen days before the settlement conference, Defendant SHALL respond, via fax or e-mail, with an

7

acceptance of the offer or with a meaningful counteroffer, which includes a brief explanation of why

8

such a settlement is appropriate.

9

If settlement is not achieved, each party SHALL attach copies of their settlement offers to their

10

Confidential Settlement Conference Statement, as described below. Copies of these documents shall

11

not be filed on the court docket.
CONFIDENTIAL SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE STATEMENT

12
13

At least five court days before the Settlement Conference, the parties shall submit, directly to

14

Judge Thurston's chambers by e-mail to [e-mail], a Confidential Settlement

15

Conference Statement. The statement should not be filed with the Clerk of the Court nor served on

16

any other party, although the parties may file a Notice of Lodging of Settlement Conference

17

Statement. Each statement shall be clearly marked "confidential" with the date and time of the

18

Settlement Conference indicated prominently thereon.

19

The Confidential Settlement Conference Statement shall include the following:

20

A.

A brief statement of the facts of the case.

21

B.

A brief statement of the claims and defenses, i.e., statutory or other grounds upon which

22

the claims are founded; a forthright evaluation of the parties' likelihood of prevailing on

23

the claims and defenses; and a description of the major issues in dispute.

24

C.

A summary of the proceedings to date.

25
26
27
28

authority, if he or she deems it appropriate, to settle the action on terms consistent with the opposing party's most recent
demand.
3
“Meaningful” means that the offer is reasonably calculated to settle the case on terms acceptable to the offering
party. “Meaningful” does not include an offer which the offering party knows will not be acceptable to the other party. If,
however, the offering party is only willing to offer a settlement which it knows the other party will not accept, this should
trigger a recognition the case is not in a settlement posture and the parties should confer about continuing or vacating the
settlement conference via stipulation.

6

1

D.

An estimate of the cost and time to be expended for further discovery, pretrial and trial.

2

E.

The relief sought.

3

F.

The party's position on settlement, including present demands and offers and a history of
past settlement discussions, offers and demands.

4
5

X.

6

Trial
Not applicable at this time.

7
8

XI.

Related Matters Pending
There are no pending related matters.

9
10

Request for Bifurcation, Appointment of Special Master, or other Techniques to Shorten

XII.

Compliance with Federal Procedure
All counsel are expected to familiarize themselves with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure

11
12

and the Local Rules of Practice of the Eastern District of California, and to keep abreast of any

13

amendments thereto. The Court must insist upon compliance with these Rules to efficiently handle its

14

increasing case load, and sanctions will be imposed for failure to follow both the Federal Rules of Civil

15

Procedure and the Local Rules of Practice for the Eastern District of California.

16

XIII. Effect of this Order
The foregoing order represents the best estimate of the court and counsel as to the agenda most

17
18

suitable to dispose of this case. The trial date reserved is specifically reserved for this case. If the

19

parties determine at any time that the schedule outlined in this order cannot be met, counsel are ordered

20

to notify the court immediately of that fact so that adjustments may be made, either by stipulation or by

21

subsequent status conference.
The dates set in this Order are considered to be firm and will not be modified absent a

22
23

showing of good cause even if the request to modify is made by stipulation. Stipulations

24

extending the deadlines contained herein will not be considered unless they are accompanied by

25

affidavits or declarations, and where appropriate attached exhibits, which establish good cause

26

for granting the relief requested.

27

///

28

///
7

1

Failure to comply with this order may result in the imposition of sanctions.

2
3
4
5

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:

January 22, 2016

/s/ Jennifer L. Thurston
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
8