Mario Molina v. Holland et al

Filing 62

ORDER GRANTING Plaintiff's 60 Motion for Interpreter, signed by Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean on 09/5/17. (Martin-Gill, S)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 8 MARIO MOLINA, 9 Plaintiff, 10 v. Case No. 1:15-cv-01260-DAD-EPG (PC) ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR INTERPRETER (ECF NO. 60) 11 K. HOLLAND, et al., 12 Defendants. 13 14 15 16 An evidentiary hearing is currently set for September 29, 2017, at 11:00 a.m. (ECF No. 17 58). On August 24, 2017, Plaintiff filed a motion for interpreter. (ECF No. 60). According to 18 Plaintiff, he needs an interpreter because he has a difficult time speaking and understanding the 19 English language. The Court finds good cause to grant Plaintiff’s motion. An interpreter will be provided 20 21 for Plaintiff at the upcoming evidentiary hearing. 22 As there will be an interpreter at the evidentiary hearing, the parties should be prepared to 23 take frequent breaks to allow sufficient time for the interpreter to rest, as this type of 24 interpretation is very taxing on the interpreter. The parties should also be prepared to put on their 25 evidence efficiently in order to allow for the additional time for interpretation and frequent rest 26 breaks. 27 \\\ 28 \\\ 1 1 2 Accordingly, based on the foregoing, IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff’s motion for interpreter is GRANTED. 3 4 IT IS SO ORDERED. 5 Dated: September 5, 2017 /s/ 6 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?