Mario Molina v. Holland et al
Filing
62
ORDER GRANTING Plaintiff's 60 Motion for Interpreter, signed by Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean on 09/5/17. (Martin-Gill, S)
1
2
3
4
5
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
6
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
7
8
MARIO MOLINA,
9
Plaintiff,
10
v.
Case No. 1:15-cv-01260-DAD-EPG (PC)
ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION
FOR INTERPRETER
(ECF NO. 60)
11
K. HOLLAND, et al.,
12
Defendants.
13
14
15
16
An evidentiary hearing is currently set for September 29, 2017, at 11:00 a.m. (ECF No.
17
58). On August 24, 2017, Plaintiff filed a motion for interpreter. (ECF No. 60). According to
18
Plaintiff, he needs an interpreter because he has a difficult time speaking and understanding the
19
English language.
The Court finds good cause to grant Plaintiff’s motion. An interpreter will be provided
20
21
for Plaintiff at the upcoming evidentiary hearing.
22
As there will be an interpreter at the evidentiary hearing, the parties should be prepared to
23
take frequent breaks to allow sufficient time for the interpreter to rest, as this type of
24
interpretation is very taxing on the interpreter. The parties should also be prepared to put on their
25
evidence efficiently in order to allow for the additional time for interpretation and frequent rest
26
breaks.
27
\\\
28
\\\
1
1
2
Accordingly, based on the foregoing, IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff’s motion for
interpreter is GRANTED.
3
4
IT IS SO ORDERED.
5
Dated:
September 5, 2017
/s/
6
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?