Sims v. Pfeiffer, et al.
Filing
12
ORDER directing Clerk of Court to close case pursuant to Plaintiff's Notice of Voluntary Dismissal re 11 signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis L. Beck on 3/31/2016. CASE CLOSED. (Lundstrom, T)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
10
JAMES MARION SIMS,
11
Plaintiff,
12
v.
13
ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF THE
COURT TO CLOSE THIS CASE
PURSUANT TO PLAINTIFF’S NOTICE
OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL
PFEIFFER, et al.,
14
Case No. 1:15-cv-01263 DLB (PC)
Defendants.
_____________________________________/
(Document 11)
15
Plaintiff James Marion Sims (“Plaintiff”), an inmate in the custody of the California
16
17 Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this
1
18 civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On March 11, 2016, the Court dismissed
19 Plaintiff’s First Amended Complaint with leave to amend.
On March 30, 2016, Plaintiff filed a motion to dismiss this action. The Court construes
20
21 this as a notice of voluntary dismissal pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(i). At
22 this stage in the proceedings, Plaintiff has the absolute right to dismiss his claims, without
23 prejudice. Duke Energy Trading & Mktg., L.L.C. v. Davis, 267 F.3d 1042, 1049 (9th Cir. 2001).
24 The filing of the notice itself has the effect of closing the action, and the Court no longer has
25 jurisdiction over the claims. Id.
26 ///
27 ///
28
1
Plaintiff consented to the jurisdiction of the United States Magistrate Judge on November 30, 2015.
1
Accordingly, the Clerk of the Court is HEREBY DIRECTED to close this file pursuant to
2 Plaintiff’s notice of voluntary dismissal, filed on March 30, 2016.2
3
4
IT IS SO ORDERED.
5
Dated:
/s/ Dennis
March 31, 2016
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
L. Beck
2
Plaintiff is informed that the Court cannot waive the remaining filing fee due.
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?