Velasquez v. Sherman

Filing 102

ORDER GRANTING 101 Joint Request to Reschedule Evidentiary Hearing, signed by Magistrate Judge Christopher D. Baker on 4/12/2024. Evidentiary Hearing RESET to 10/4/2024 at 10:30 AM in Bakersfield (CDB) before Magistrate Judge Christopher D. Baker. (Marrujo, C)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 RICARDO VELASQUEZ, 12 Petitioner, 13 v. 14 STU SHERMAN. 15 Case No. 1:15-cv-01288-KES-CDB ORDER GRANTING JOINT REQUEST TO RESCHEDULE EVIDENTIARY HEARING (Doc. 101) Respondent. 16 17 18 On November 9, 2023, the Court scheduled an evidentiary hearing in this matter for May 19 24, 2024, at 10:30 AM in Bakersfield before Magistrate Judge Christopher D. Baker. (Doc. 98). 20 Pending before the Court is the parties’ joint request to reschedule that evidentiary hearing. 21 (Doc. 101). In light of the parties’ representations and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY 22 ORDERED: 23 24 25 26 1. The parties’ joint request to reschedule the evidentiary hearing (Doc. 101) is GRANTED; 2. The May 24, 2024, evidentiary hearing is reset to October 4, 2024 at 10:30 AM in Bakersfield before Magistrate Judge Christopher D. Baker; and 27 3. The Court understands the parties anticipate there will be five (5) witnesses and 28 the evidentiary hearing will take approximately three (3) hours. At least 45 days 1 prior to the hearing, counsel shall notify the Court (1) whether any witnesses will 2 require the assistance of a linguist, (2) whether attendance of any of the witnesses 3 will require the Court to issue s writ, and (3) whether the parties’ estimation of 4 number of witnesses and time has materially changed. 5 6 7 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: April 12, 2024 ___________________ _ UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?